Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEAutoCAD Plant 3D VS MicroStation_
As of 4 November 2026, MicroStation is named by 1,030 companies and AutoCAD Plant 3D by 425; AutoCAD Plant 3D skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 40%), MicroStation to companies over 1,000 (30% vs 35%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: AutoCAD Plant 3D's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, MicroStation rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- AutoCAD Plant 3D: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- MicroStation: 2–200 employees
- 40%
- AutoCAD Plant 3D: 1,000+ employees
- 35%
- MicroStation: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 8.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | AutoCAD Plant 3D | share | MicroStation | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 1% | 12 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 30 | 7% | 59 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 43 | 10% | 119 | 12% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 77 | 18% | 233 | 23% | MicroStation |
| 201-500 employees | 69 | 16% | 192 | 19% | MicroStation |
| 501-1000 employees | 53 | 12% | 106 | 10% | AutoCAD Plant 3D |
| 1001-5000 employees | 87 | 20% | 162 | 16% | AutoCAD Plant 3D |
| 5001-10000 employees | 16 | 4% | 53 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 47 | 11% | 94 | 9% | even |
| Segment | AutoCAD Plant 3D | share | MicroStation | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 195 | 46% | 526 | 51% | MicroStation |
| Manufacturing & industry | 89 | 21% | 58 | 6% | AutoCAD Plant 3D |
| Property & construction | 60 | 14% | 231 | 22% | MicroStation |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 38 | 9% | 61 | 6% | AutoCAD Plant 3D |
| Technology & software | 17 | 4% | 40 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 11 | 3% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 1% | 40 | 4% | MicroStation |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 0% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 0% | 20 | 2% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | – | – | 15 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AutoCAD Plant 3D | share | MicroStation | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 221 | 52% | 677 | 66% | MicroStation |
| Germany | 36 | 8% | 70 | 7% | even |
| France | 23 | 5% | 29 | 3% | AutoCAD Plant 3D |
| Canada | 17 | 4% | 47 | 5% | even |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 3% | 36 | 3% | even |
| India | 13 | 3% | 9 | 1% | AutoCAD Plant 3D |
| Netherlands | 13 | 3% | 25 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 12 | 3% | 27 | 3% | even |
| Belgium | 10 | 2% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 8 | 2% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 7 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 7 | 2% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Poland | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AutoCAD Plant 3D | share | MicroStation | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 1,330 | 83% | 8,808 | 77% | AutoCAD Plant 3D |
| construction and civil | 32 | 2% | 1,273 | 11% | MicroStation |
| Product, program & project management | 23 | 1% | 125 | 1% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 15 | 1% | 47 | 0% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 11 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 8 | 1% | 30 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 5 | 0% | 17 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 4 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Software engineering | 4 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 3 | 0% | 52 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 3 | 0% | 50 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 2 | 0% | 17 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| healthcare support and caregiving | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 1 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| research and science | – | – | 14 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 9 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| real estate and property | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using AutoCAD Plant 3D →
Companies using MicroStation →
cad drafting ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
MicroStation is named by 1,030 companies in job postings and AutoCAD Plant 3D by 425; 58 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/autocad-plant-3d-vs-microstation)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
AutoCAD Plant 3D vs MicroStation: questions
Which is more used, AutoCAD Plant 3D or MicroStation?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, MicroStation (1,030) over AutoCAD Plant 3D (425). By website-and-DNS footprint, MicroStation (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses AutoCAD Plant 3D?
35% of AutoCAD Plant 3D companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 40% for MicroStation. 35% of AutoCAD Plant 3D companies have over 1,000 employees, against 30% for MicroStation.
Do companies run both?
58 companies name both in their postings, usually AutoCAD Plant 3D in marketing and MicroStation in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on AutoCAD Plant 3D or MicroStation, and get 1,000 records free.