Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEAWS Application Load Balancer VS AWS Elastic Load Balancing_
As of 4 November 2026, AWS Elastic Load Balancing is named by 216 companies and AWS Application Load Balancer by 281; AWS Application Load Balancer skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 47%), AWS Elastic Load Balancing to companies over 1,000 (34% vs 32%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: AWS Application Load Balancer's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, AWS Elastic Load Balancing rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- AWS Application Load Balancer: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- AWS Elastic Load Balancing: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- AWS Application Load Balancer: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- AWS Elastic Load Balancing: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.5 · 2.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | AWS Application Load Balancer | share | AWS Elastic Load Balancing | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 23 | 8% | 5 | 2% | AWS Application Load Balancer |
| 11-50 employees | 37 | 13% | 40 | 19% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| 51-200 employees | 68 | 24% | 56 | 26% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 37 | 13% | 24 | 11% | AWS Application Load Balancer |
| 501-1000 employees | 21 | 7% | 17 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 38 | 14% | 36 | 17% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| 5001-10000 employees | 22 | 8% | 16 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 30 | 11% | 22 | 10% | even |
| Segment | AWS Application Load Balancer | share | AWS Elastic Load Balancing | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 152 | 54% | 124 | 57% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| Business & finance services | 52 | 19% | 49 | 23% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| Manufacturing & industry | 18 | 6% | 11 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 13 | 5% | 9 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 11 | 4% | 1 | 0% | AWS Application Load Balancer |
| Media & content | 9 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 7 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 6 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 4 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AWS Application Load Balancer | share | AWS Elastic Load Balancing | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 184 | 65% | 144 | 67% | even |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 6% | 15 | 7% | even |
| India | 10 | 4% | 15 | 7% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| Japan | 9 | 3% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 8 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| France | 7 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Singapore | 4 | 1% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Germany | 2 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| South Korea | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| South Africa | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AWS Application Load Balancer | share | AWS Elastic Load Balancing | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 350 | 58% | 340 | 52% | AWS Application Load Balancer |
| IT operations & business systems | 153 | 25% | 183 | 28% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| Data & AI | 28 | 5% | 17 | 3% | AWS Application Load Balancer |
| Engineering (non-software) | 5 | 1% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 5 | 1% | 25 | 4% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| Administration & office | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 3 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using AWS Application Load Balancer →
Companies using AWS Elastic Load Balancing →
load balancers adc ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
AWS Elastic Load Balancing is named by 216 companies in job postings and AWS Application Load Balancer by 281; 70 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/aws-application-load-balancer-vs-aws-elastic-load-balancing)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
AWS Application Load Balancer vs AWS Elastic Load Balancing: questions
Which is more used, AWS Application Load Balancer or AWS Elastic Load Balancing?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, AWS Application Load Balancer (281) over AWS Elastic Load Balancing (216). By website-and-DNS footprint, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses AWS Application Load Balancer?
46% of AWS Application Load Balancer companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 47% for AWS Elastic Load Balancing. 32% of AWS Application Load Balancer companies have over 1,000 employees, against 34% for AWS Elastic Load Balancing.
Do companies run both?
70 companies name both in their postings, usually AWS Application Load Balancer in marketing and AWS Elastic Load Balancing in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on AWS Application Load Balancer or AWS Elastic Load Balancing, and get 1,000 records free.