Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEAWS Elastic Load Balancing VS Azure Application Gateway_
As of 4 November 2026, Azure Application Gateway is named by 159 companies and AWS Elastic Load Balancing by 216; AWS Elastic Load Balancing skews to companies under 200 people (47% vs 29%), Azure Application Gateway to companies over 1,000 (43% vs 34%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: AWS Elastic Load Balancing's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Azure Application Gateway rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- AWS Elastic Load Balancing: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- Azure Application Gateway: 2–200 employees
- 29%
- AWS Elastic Load Balancing: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Azure Application Gateway: 1,000+ employees
- 43%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.2 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | AWS Elastic Load Balancing | share | Azure Application Gateway | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 5 | 2% | 6 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 40 | 19% | 17 | 11% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| 51-200 employees | 56 | 26% | 23 | 14% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| 201-500 employees | 24 | 11% | 23 | 14% | Azure Application Gateway |
| 501-1000 employees | 17 | 8% | 19 | 12% | Azure Application Gateway |
| 1001-5000 employees | 36 | 17% | 24 | 15% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 16 | 7% | 16 | 10% | Azure Application Gateway |
| 10,001+ employees | 22 | 10% | 29 | 18% | Azure Application Gateway |
| Self-employed | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AWS Elastic Load Balancing | share | Azure Application Gateway | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 124 | 57% | 72 | 45% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| Business & finance services | 49 | 23% | 35 | 22% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 11 | 5% | 11 | 7% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 9 | 4% | 9 | 6% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 5 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 4 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 5 | 3% | Azure Application Gateway |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 5 | 3% | Azure Application Gateway |
| Automotive | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 0% | 5 | 3% | Azure Application Gateway |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AWS Elastic Load Balancing | share | Azure Application Gateway | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 144 | 67% | 85 | 53% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 7% | 18 | 11% | Azure Application Gateway |
| India | 15 | 7% | 8 | 5% | even |
| Singapore | 6 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Germany | 3 | 1% | 6 | 4% | Azure Application Gateway |
| France | 3 | 1% | 6 | 4% | Azure Application Gateway |
| Japan | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 2 | 1% | 6 | 4% | Azure Application Gateway |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Norway | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AWS Elastic Load Balancing | share | Azure Application Gateway | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 340 | 52% | 158 | 36% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| IT operations & business systems | 183 | 28% | 208 | 47% | Azure Application Gateway |
| Product, program & project management | 25 | 4% | 3 | 1% | AWS Elastic Load Balancing |
| Data & AI | 17 | 3% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 11 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using AWS Elastic Load Balancing →
Companies using Azure Application Gateway →
load balancers adc ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Azure Application Gateway is named by 159 companies in job postings and AWS Elastic Load Balancing by 216; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/aws-elastic-load-balancing-vs-azure-application-gateway)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
AWS Elastic Load Balancing vs Azure Application Gateway: questions
Which is more used, AWS Elastic Load Balancing or Azure Application Gateway?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (216) over Azure Application Gateway (159). By website-and-DNS footprint, Azure Application Gateway (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses AWS Elastic Load Balancing?
47% of AWS Elastic Load Balancing companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 29% for Azure Application Gateway. 34% of AWS Elastic Load Balancing companies have over 1,000 employees, against 43% for Azure Application Gateway.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually AWS Elastic Load Balancing in marketing and Azure Application Gateway in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on AWS Elastic Load Balancing or Azure Application Gateway, and get 1,000 records free.