Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEBrowserStack VS OpenText Quality Center_
As of 4 November 2026, OpenText Quality Center is named by 316 companies and BrowserStack by 242; BrowserStack skews to companies under 200 people (41% vs 42%), OpenText Quality Center to companies over 1,000 (29% vs 35%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: BrowserStack's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, OpenText Quality Center rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- BrowserStack: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- OpenText Quality Center: 2–200 employees
- 42%
- BrowserStack: 1,000+ employees
- 35%
- OpenText Quality Center: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.1 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 258 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | BrowserStack | share | OpenText Quality Center | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 8 | 3% | 12 | 4% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 14 | 6% | 17 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 33 | 14% | 41 | 13% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 52 | 21% | 76 | 24% | OpenText Quality Center |
| 201-500 employees | 31 | 13% | 46 | 15% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 20 | 8% | 31 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 38 | 16% | 34 | 11% | BrowserStack |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 5% | 15 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 35 | 14% | 44 | 14% | even |
| Segment | BrowserStack | share | OpenText Quality Center | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 113 | 47% | 188 | 59% | OpenText Quality Center |
| Business & finance services | 60 | 25% | 71 | 22% | BrowserStack |
| Manufacturing & industry | 17 | 7% | 21 | 7% | even |
| Media & content | 12 | 5% | 5 | 2% | BrowserStack |
| Hospitality & travel | 8 | 3% | 3 | 1% | BrowserStack |
| Commerce & trade | 7 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 4 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 4 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | BrowserStack | share | OpenText Quality Center | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 135 | 56% | 166 | 53% | BrowserStack |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 9% | 17 | 5% | BrowserStack |
| India | 12 | 5% | 14 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 10 | 4% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 7 | 3% | 12 | 4% | even |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 4 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 3 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | 2 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| France | – | – | 31 | 10% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | BrowserStack | share | OpenText Quality Center | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 456 | 72% | 1,026 | 61% | BrowserStack |
| Engineering (non-software) | 48 | 8% | 66 | 4% | BrowserStack |
| Quality, safety & environment | 42 | 7% | 49 | 3% | BrowserStack |
| Sales | 17 | 3% | 4 | 0% | BrowserStack |
| IT operations & business systems | 10 | 2% | 238 | 14% | OpenText Quality Center |
| Marketing & communications | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 7 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 0% | 33 | 2% | even |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | 31 | 2% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using BrowserStack →
Companies using OpenText Quality Center →
test management device clouds ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
OpenText Quality Center is named by 316 companies in job postings and BrowserStack by 242; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/browserstack-vs-quality-center)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
BrowserStack vs OpenText Quality Center: questions
Which is more used, BrowserStack or OpenText Quality Center?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, OpenText Quality Center (316) over BrowserStack (242). By website-and-DNS footprint, BrowserStack (258 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses BrowserStack?
41% of BrowserStack companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 42% for OpenText Quality Center. 35% of BrowserStack companies have over 1,000 employees, against 29% for OpenText Quality Center.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually BrowserStack in marketing and OpenText Quality Center in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on BrowserStack or OpenText Quality Center, and get 1,000 records free.