Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DECAQH ProView VS McKesson_
As of 4 November 2026, McKesson is named by 117 companies and CAQH ProView by 156; CAQH ProView skews to companies under 200 people (29% vs 20%), McKesson to companies over 1,000 (62% vs 33%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CAQH ProView's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, McKesson rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- CAQH ProView: 2–200 employees
- 29%
- McKesson: 2–200 employees
- 20%
- CAQH ProView: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- McKesson: 1,000+ employees
- 62%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.1 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | CAQH ProView | share | McKesson | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 6 | 4% | 5 | 4% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 9 | 6% | 6 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 17 | 11% | 8 | 7% | CAQH ProView |
| 51-200 employees | 20 | 13% | 9 | 8% | CAQH ProView |
| 201-500 employees | 30 | 19% | 10 | 9% | CAQH ProView |
| 501-1000 employees | 23 | 15% | 7 | 6% | CAQH ProView |
| 1001-5000 employees | 29 | 19% | 32 | 27% | McKesson |
| 5001-10000 employees | 7 | 4% | 15 | 13% | McKesson |
| 10,001+ employees | 15 | 10% | 25 | 21% | McKesson |
| Segment | CAQH ProView | share | McKesson | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health care | 111 | 71% | 83 | 71% | even |
| Business & finance services | 24 | 15% | 11 | 9% | CAQH ProView |
| Technology & software | 12 | 8% | 11 | 9% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 6 | 4% | 6 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing & industry | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CAQH ProView | share | McKesson | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 148 | 95% | 103 | 88% | CAQH ProView |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| India | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Canada | – | – | 7 | 6% | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CAQH ProView | share | McKesson | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration & office | 169 | 75% | 36 | 8% | CAQH ProView |
| healthcare clinical | 14 | 6% | 172 | 37% | McKesson |
| Finance & accounting | 6 | 3% | 19 | 4% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 4 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | 20 | 4% | McKesson |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| healthcare support and caregiving | 1 | 0% | 44 | 10% | McKesson |
| Software engineering | 1 | 0% | 12 | 3% | McKesson |
| Sales | – | – | 18 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | – | – | 17 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | – | – | 12 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | – | – | 9 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| social care and community | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using CAQH ProView →
Companies using McKesson →
healthcare admin revenue cycle ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
McKesson is named by 117 companies in job postings and CAQH ProView by 156; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/caqh-proview-vs-mckesson)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
CAQH ProView vs McKesson: questions
Which is more used, CAQH ProView or McKesson?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, CAQH ProView (156) over McKesson (117). By website-and-DNS footprint, McKesson (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses CAQH ProView?
29% of CAQH ProView companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 20% for McKesson. 33% of CAQH ProView companies have over 1,000 employees, against 62% for McKesson.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually CAQH ProView in marketing and McKesson in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on CAQH ProView or McKesson, and get 1,000 records free.