Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DECaseWare VS CCH Axcess_
As of 4 November 2026, CCH Axcess is named by 159 companies and CaseWare by 195; CaseWare skews to companies under 200 people (59% vs 54%), CCH Axcess to companies over 1,000 (13% vs 15%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CaseWare's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, CCH Axcess rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- CaseWare: 2–200 employees
- 59%
- CCH Axcess: 2–200 employees
- 54%
- CaseWare: 1,000+ employees
- 15%
- CCH Axcess: 1,000+ employees
- 13%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.6 · 3.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | CaseWare | share | CCH Axcess | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 5 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 26 | 13% | 8 | 5% | CaseWare |
| 11-50 employees | 37 | 19% | 23 | 14% | CaseWare |
| 51-200 employees | 53 | 27% | 55 | 35% | CCH Axcess |
| 201-500 employees | 29 | 15% | 27 | 17% | CCH Axcess |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 8% | 21 | 13% | CCH Axcess |
| 1001-5000 employees | 18 | 9% | 12 | 8% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 7 | 4% | 6 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 5 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Segment | CaseWare | share | CCH Axcess | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 171 | 88% | 141 | 89% | even |
| Technology & software | 8 | 4% | 9 | 6% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 3 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing & industry | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CaseWare | share | CCH Axcess | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 63 | 32% | 143 | 90% | CCH Axcess |
| Canada | 53 | 27% | 3 | 2% | CaseWare |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 9% | 3 | 2% | CaseWare |
| Netherlands | 12 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 11 | 6% | 1 | 1% | CaseWare |
| Cyprus | 6 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 5 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| France | 5 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| India | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Romania | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CaseWare | share | CCH Axcess | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 892 | 81% | 655 | 91% | CCH Axcess |
| Administration & office | 21 | 2% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 11 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 7 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 6 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 4 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 3 | 0% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using CaseWare →
Companies using CCH Axcess →
tax audit tools ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
CCH Axcess is named by 159 companies in job postings and CaseWare by 195; 22 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/caseware-vs-cch-axcess)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
CaseWare vs CCH Axcess: questions
Which is more used, CaseWare or CCH Axcess?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, CaseWare (195) over CCH Axcess (159). By website-and-DNS footprint, CCH Axcess (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses CaseWare?
59% of CaseWare companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 54% for CCH Axcess. 15% of CaseWare companies have over 1,000 employees, against 13% for CCH Axcess.
Do companies run both?
22 companies name both in their postings, usually CaseWare in marketing and CCH Axcess in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on CaseWare or CCH Axcess, and get 1,000 records free.