Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DECCC ONE VS Reynolds ERA_
As of 4 November 2026, Reynolds ERA is named by 134 companies and CCC ONE by 218; CCC ONE skews to companies under 200 people (56% vs 34%), Reynolds ERA to companies over 1,000 (43% vs 25%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CCC ONE's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Reynolds ERA rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- CCC ONE: 2–200 employees
- 56%
- Reynolds ERA: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- CCC ONE: 1,000+ employees
- 25%
- Reynolds ERA: 1,000+ employees
- 43%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 5.6 · 1.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | CCC ONE | share | Reynolds ERA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 38 | 17% | 10 | 7% | CCC ONE |
| 11-50 employees | 32 | 15% | 9 | 7% | CCC ONE |
| 51-200 employees | 52 | 24% | 26 | 19% | CCC ONE |
| 201-500 employees | 21 | 10% | 21 | 16% | Reynolds ERA |
| 501-1000 employees | 18 | 8% | 10 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 20 | 9% | 32 | 24% | Reynolds ERA |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 6% | 7 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 23 | 11% | 18 | 13% | Reynolds ERA |
| Segment | CCC ONE | share | Reynolds ERA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automotive | 143 | 66% | 17 | 13% | CCC ONE |
| Business & finance services | 29 | 13% | 19 | 14% | even |
| Technology & software | 14 | 6% | 19 | 14% | Reynolds ERA |
| Manufacturing & industry | 6 | 3% | 7 | 5% | Reynolds ERA |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 2% | 11 | 8% | Reynolds ERA |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 2% | 11 | 8% | Reynolds ERA |
| Health care | 3 | 1% | 38 | 28% | Reynolds ERA |
| Media & content | 3 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 1% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CCC ONE | share | Reynolds ERA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 187 | 86% | 105 | 78% | CCC ONE |
| Canada | 6 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| India | 3 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| France | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Austria | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Germany | 1 | 0% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| MY | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Slovakia | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Hungary | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| ID | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| PH | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CCC ONE | share | Reynolds ERA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| skilled trades and field service | 900 | 56% | 5 | 2% | CCC ONE |
| Finance & accounting | 173 | 11% | 59 | 21% | Reynolds ERA |
| Customer service & success | 82 | 5% | 11 | 4% | even |
| construction and civil | 81 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | 68 | 4% | 2 | 1% | CCC ONE |
| healthcare clinical | 18 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 15 | 1% | 25 | 9% | Reynolds ERA |
| Sales | 14 | 1% | 10 | 4% | Reynolds ERA |
| Engineering (non-software) | 13 | 1% | 30 | 11% | Reynolds ERA |
| General management & consulting | 13 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Software engineering | 13 | 1% | 8 | 3% | Reynolds ERA |
| hospitality and food service | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 8 | 1% | 18 | 7% | Reynolds ERA |
| facilities cleaning and security | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 3 | 0% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Data & AI | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 2 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| real estate and property | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 9 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 9 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 7 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| public safety and protective services | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using CCC ONE →
Companies using Reynolds ERA →
automotive dealer repair ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Reynolds ERA is named by 134 companies in job postings and CCC ONE by 218; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ccc-one-vs-reynolds-era)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
CCC ONE vs Reynolds ERA: questions
Which is more used, CCC ONE or Reynolds ERA?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, CCC ONE (218) over Reynolds ERA (134). By website-and-DNS footprint, Reynolds ERA (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses CCC ONE?
56% of CCC ONE companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for Reynolds ERA. 25% of CCC ONE companies have over 1,000 employees, against 43% for Reynolds ERA.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually CCC ONE in marketing and Reynolds ERA in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on CCC ONE or Reynolds ERA, and get 1,000 records free.