Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DECheck Point VS Cisco ASA_
As of 4 November 2026, Cisco ASA is named by 443 companies and Check Point by 607; Check Point skews to companies under 200 people (31% vs 41%), Cisco ASA to companies over 1,000 (38% vs 46%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Check Point's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Cisco ASA rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Check Point: 2–200 employees
- 31%
- Cisco ASA: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- Check Point: 1,000+ employees
- 46%
- Cisco ASA: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.0 · 2.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Check Point | share | Cisco ASA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 11 | 2% | 12 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 33 | 5% | 36 | 8% | Cisco ASA |
| 11-50 employees | 61 | 10% | 49 | 11% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 97 | 16% | 97 | 22% | Cisco ASA |
| 201-500 employees | 83 | 14% | 47 | 11% | Check Point |
| 501-1000 employees | 43 | 7% | 35 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 120 | 20% | 79 | 18% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 34 | 6% | 26 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 125 | 21% | 62 | 14% | Check Point |
| Segment | Check Point | share | Cisco ASA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 239 | 39% | 188 | 42% | Cisco ASA |
| Business & finance services | 142 | 23% | 98 | 22% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 51 | 8% | 50 | 11% | Cisco ASA |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 34 | 6% | 19 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 32 | 5% | 17 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 27 | 4% | 13 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 18 | 3% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 18 | 3% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 13 | 2% | 13 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 12 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 8 | 1% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 10 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Check Point | share | Cisco ASA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 301 | 50% | 271 | 61% | Cisco ASA |
| United Kingdom | 39 | 6% | 32 | 7% | even |
| France | 37 | 6% | 12 | 3% | Check Point |
| Germany | 26 | 4% | 12 | 3% | even |
| India | 20 | 3% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Italy | 16 | 3% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 14 | 2% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Belgium | 12 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 12 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 10 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 9 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 8 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Check Point | share | Cisco ASA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 1,597 | 64% | 1,011 | 74% | Cisco ASA |
| Finance & accounting | 183 | 7% | 12 | 1% | Check Point |
| Sales | 126 | 5% | 17 | 1% | Check Point |
| Software engineering | 111 | 4% | 6 | 0% | Check Point |
| Customer service & success | 79 | 3% | 5 | 0% | Check Point |
| Product, program & project management | 39 | 2% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 28 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 15 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 12 | 0% | 32 | 2% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 11 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 10 | 0% | 7 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 10 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 7 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 6 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 5 | 0% | 70 | 5% | Cisco ASA |
| real estate and property | 5 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Travel, leisure & events | 5 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 3 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| social care and community | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 2 | 0% | 12 | 1% | even |
| arts media and entertainment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| hospitality and food service | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | – | – | 17 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Check Point →
Companies using Cisco ASA →
network security zero trust ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Cisco ASA is named by 443 companies in job postings and Check Point by 607; 119 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/check-point-vs-cisco-asa)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Check Point vs Cisco ASA: questions
Which is more used, Check Point or Cisco ASA?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Check Point (607) over Cisco ASA (443). By website-and-DNS footprint, Cisco ASA (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Check Point?
31% of Check Point companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 41% for Cisco ASA. 46% of Check Point companies have over 1,000 employees, against 38% for Cisco ASA.
Do companies run both?
119 companies name both in their postings, usually Check Point in marketing and Cisco ASA in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Check Point or Cisco ASA, and get 1,000 records free.