Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DECheckmarx VS OWASP ZAP_
As of 4 November 2026, OWASP ZAP is named by 312 companies and Checkmarx by 244; Checkmarx skews to companies under 200 people (30% vs 39%), OWASP ZAP to companies over 1,000 (31% vs 43%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Checkmarx's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, OWASP ZAP rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Checkmarx: 2–200 employees
- 30%
- OWASP ZAP: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- Checkmarx: 1,000+ employees
- 43%
- OWASP ZAP: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.6 · 1.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Checkmarx | share | OWASP ZAP | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 6 | 2% | 9 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 13 | 5% | 20 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 25 | 10% | 52 | 17% | OWASP ZAP |
| 51-200 employees | 36 | 15% | 51 | 16% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 40 | 16% | 57 | 18% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 20 | 8% | 26 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 45 | 18% | 44 | 14% | Checkmarx |
| 5001-10000 employees | 10 | 4% | 16 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 49 | 20% | 37 | 12% | Checkmarx |
| Segment | Checkmarx | share | OWASP ZAP | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 121 | 50% | 173 | 55% | OWASP ZAP |
| Business & finance services | 73 | 30% | 59 | 19% | Checkmarx |
| Manufacturing & industry | 14 | 6% | 20 | 6% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 2% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 2% | 12 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 5 | 2% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 2% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 3 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Checkmarx | share | OWASP ZAP | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 164 | 67% | 176 | 56% | Checkmarx |
| France | 13 | 5% | 7 | 2% | Checkmarx |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 5% | 19 | 6% | even |
| India | 9 | 4% | 18 | 6% | OWASP ZAP |
| Canada | 5 | 2% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Singapore | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 3 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Portugal | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Romania | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Germany | – | – | 11 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| MY | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Checkmarx | share | OWASP ZAP | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 442 | 54% | 208 | 31% | Checkmarx |
| IT operations & business systems | 258 | 32% | 335 | 50% | OWASP ZAP |
| Data & AI | 17 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 14 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 0% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| healthcare support and caregiving | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Checkmarx →
Companies using OWASP ZAP →
application security testing ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
OWASP ZAP is named by 312 companies in job postings and Checkmarx by 244; 86 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/checkmarx-vs-owasp-zap)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Checkmarx vs OWASP ZAP: questions
Which is more used, Checkmarx or OWASP ZAP?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, OWASP ZAP (312) over Checkmarx (244). By website-and-DNS footprint, OWASP ZAP (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Checkmarx?
30% of Checkmarx companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 39% for OWASP ZAP. 43% of Checkmarx companies have over 1,000 employees, against 31% for OWASP ZAP.
Do companies run both?
86 companies name both in their postings, usually Checkmarx in marketing and OWASP ZAP in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Checkmarx or OWASP ZAP, and get 1,000 records free.