Compare · ai coding assistants

Codex VS Lovable_

As of 4 November 2026, Lovable is named by 413 companies and Codex by 2,265; Codex skews to companies under 200 people (49% vs 55%), Lovable to companies over 1,000 (17% vs 23%).

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Codex's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Lovable rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Codex: 2–200 employees
49%
Lovable: 2–200 employees
55%
Codex: 1,000+ employees
23%
Lovable: 1,000+ employees
17%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.6 · 1.8
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 3,890
2,265companies name Codex
413companies name Lovable
0name both
5,911 · 730postings in 90 days, Codex · Lovable
02 — Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentCodexshareLovableshareLeans
Self-employed1256%246%even
2-10 employees25611%5614%Lovable
11-50 employees36916%8721%Lovable
51-200 employees47721%8521%even
201-500 employees30513%6115%even
501-1000 employees2109%287%Codex
1001-5000 employees29113%4310%Codex
5001-10000 employees763%154%even
10,001+ employees1567%143%Codex
By industry
SegmentCodexshareLovableshareLeans
Technology & software1,11749%21051%even
Business & finance services53724%9423%even
Manufacturing & industry1466%184%Codex
Media & content1316%174%even
Commerce & trade653%143%even
Consumer services & leisure643%205%Lovable
Public, community & associations552%61%even
Health care342%72%even
Utilities & infrastructure311%41%even
Property & construction261%113%even
Automotive231%––outside top 12
Hospitality & travel181%82%even
Transport, logistics & rental––20%outside top 12
By country
SegmentCodexshareLovableshareLeans
United States1,44764%21853%Codex
United Kingdom1517%328%even
Germany1376%4210%Lovable
Canada462%61%even
France422%123%even
Sweden301%92%even
India241%102%even
Brazil231%113%even
Japan231%––outside top 12
Netherlands231%72%even
Poland201%––outside top 12
Switzerland181%––outside top 12
Spain––72%outside top 12
Belgium––61%outside top 12
Australia––31%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentCodexshareLovableshareLeans
Software engineering3,01242%11311%Codex
Data & AI1,60622%838%Codex
IT operations & business systems4196%232%Codex
Product, program & project management3575%18919%Lovable
Engineering (non-software)1843%30%Codex
Sales1652%384%even
Marketing & communications1422%859%Lovable
Design & UX1212%17918%Lovable
Finance & accounting951%81%even
General management & consulting581%131%even
Customer service & success471%131%even
Legal, compliance & risk330%51%even
Unclassified270%40%even
research and science250%––outside top 12
Business development & strategy220%111%even
Human resources220%91%even
arts media and entertainment150%30%even
Education & training140%10%even
logistics warehouse and transport110%10%even
Quality, safety & environment100%––outside top 12
Administration & office90%71%even
construction and civil50%91%even
healthcare support and caregiving20%––outside top 12
manufacturing and production20%30%even
procurement and purchasing20%20%even
facilities cleaning and security10%––outside top 12
social care and community10%––outside top 12
Retail & store operations––71%outside top 12
healthcare clinical––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Lovable is named by 413 companies in job postings and Codex by 2,265; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/codex-vs-lovable)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Codex vs Lovable: questions

Which is more used, Codex or Lovable?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Codex (2,265) over Lovable (413). By website-and-DNS footprint, Lovable (3,890 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Codex?

49% of Codex companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 55% for Lovable. 23% of Codex companies have over 1,000 employees, against 17% for Lovable.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Codex in marketing and Lovable in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Codex or Lovable, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free