Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DECognex VS Zebra Technologies_
As of 4 November 2026, Zebra Technologies is named by 204 companies and Cognex by 253; Cognex skews to companies under 200 people (21% vs 21%), Zebra Technologies to companies over 1,000 (51% vs 52%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Cognex's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Zebra Technologies rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Cognex: 2–200 employees
- 21%
- Zebra Technologies: 2–200 employees
- 21%
- Cognex: 1,000+ employees
- 52%
- Zebra Technologies: 1,000+ employees
- 51%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 29.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Cognex | share | Zebra Technologies | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 5 | 2% | 6 | 3% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 14 | 6% | 12 | 6% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 34 | 13% | 24 | 12% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 33 | 13% | 32 | 16% | Zebra Technologies |
| 501-1000 employees | 34 | 13% | 22 | 11% | Cognex |
| 1001-5000 employees | 40 | 16% | 39 | 19% | Zebra Technologies |
| 5001-10000 employees | 23 | 9% | 15 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 68 | 27% | 51 | 25% | even |
| Segment | Cognex | share | Zebra Technologies | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 153 | 60% | 66 | 32% | Cognex |
| Automotive | 44 | 17% | 9 | 4% | Cognex |
| Business & finance services | 17 | 7% | 8 | 4% | Cognex |
| Technology & software | 11 | 4% | 25 | 12% | Zebra Technologies |
| Commerce & trade | 10 | 4% | 50 | 25% | Zebra Technologies |
| Health care | 5 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 4 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 0% | 14 | 7% | Zebra Technologies |
| Public, community & associations | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cognex | share | Zebra Technologies | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 174 | 69% | 141 | 69% | even |
| Germany | 18 | 7% | 9 | 4% | Cognex |
| Canada | 11 | 4% | 13 | 6% | Zebra Technologies |
| France | 11 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Cognex |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% | 7 | 3% | even |
| India | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| MY | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| China | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| AF | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cognex | share | Zebra Technologies | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 474 | 57% | 31 | 1% | Cognex |
| skilled trades and field service | 159 | 19% | 13 | 0% | Cognex |
| Sales | 35 | 4% | 34 | 1% | Cognex |
| Software engineering | 21 | 3% | 53 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 13 | 2% | 10 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 9 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 5 | 1% | 19 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 4 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 4 | 0% | 9 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 3 | 0% | 33 | 1% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 2 | 0% | 155 | 3% | Zebra Technologies |
| Unclassified | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | 773 | 13% | Zebra Technologies |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| procurement and purchasing | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| research and science | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 685 | 11% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 31 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | – | – | 21 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| healthcare support and caregiving | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Cognex →
Companies using Zebra Technologies →
end user devices peripherals ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Zebra Technologies is named by 204 companies in job postings and Cognex by 253; 11 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/cognex-vs-zebra-technologies)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Cognex vs Zebra Technologies: questions
Which is more used, Cognex or Zebra Technologies?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Cognex (253) over Zebra Technologies (204). By website-and-DNS footprint, Zebra Technologies (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Cognex?
21% of Cognex companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 21% for Zebra Technologies. 52% of Cognex companies have over 1,000 employees, against 51% for Zebra Technologies.
Do companies run both?
11 companies name both in their postings, usually Cognex in marketing and Zebra Technologies in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Cognex or Zebra Technologies, and get 1,000 records free.