Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEcontainerd VS Docker Compose_
As of 4 November 2026, Docker Compose is named by 521 companies and containerd by 125; containerd skews to companies under 200 people (54% vs 54%), Docker Compose to companies over 1,000 (21% vs 23%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: containerd's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Docker Compose rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- containerd: 2–200 employees
- 54%
- Docker Compose: 2–200 employees
- 54%
- containerd: 1,000+ employees
- 23%
- Docker Compose: 1,000+ employees
- 21%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 1.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | containerd | share | Docker Compose | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 6 | 5% | 27 | 5% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 11 | 9% | 44 | 8% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 22 | 18% | 97 | 19% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 34 | 27% | 142 | 27% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 18 | 14% | 57 | 11% | containerd |
| 501-1000 employees | 5 | 4% | 45 | 9% | Docker Compose |
| 1001-5000 employees | 17 | 14% | 55 | 11% | containerd |
| 5001-10000 employees | 3 | 2% | 15 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 9 | 7% | 39 | 7% | even |
| Segment | containerd | share | Docker Compose | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 77 | 62% | 290 | 56% | containerd |
| Manufacturing & industry | 18 | 14% | 62 | 12% | containerd |
| Business & finance services | 14 | 11% | 82 | 16% | Docker Compose |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 4% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 2% | 15 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 22 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 2% | 17 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | containerd | share | Docker Compose | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 89 | 71% | 279 | 54% | containerd |
| Singapore | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 3 | 2% | 36 | 7% | Docker Compose |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% | 35 | 7% | Docker Compose |
| Luxembourg | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% | 16 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| India | 2 | 2% | 13 | 2% | even |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 17 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 16 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 9 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | containerd | share | Docker Compose | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 257 | 72% | 886 | 73% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 33 | 9% | 80 | 7% | containerd |
| Engineering (non-software) | 16 | 4% | 31 | 3% | even |
| Data & AI | 9 | 3% | 79 | 7% | Docker Compose |
| Sales | 5 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 3 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using containerd →
Companies using Docker Compose →
containers ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Docker Compose is named by 521 companies in job postings and containerd by 125; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/containerd-vs-docker-compose)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
containerd vs Docker Compose: questions
Which is more used, containerd or Docker Compose?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Docker Compose (521) over containerd (125). By website-and-DNS footprint, Docker Compose (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses containerd?
54% of containerd companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 54% for Docker Compose. 23% of containerd companies have over 1,000 employees, against 21% for Docker Compose.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually containerd in marketing and Docker Compose in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on containerd or Docker Compose, and get 1,000 records free.