Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DECrowdStrike Falcon VS Microsoft Defender_
As of 4 November 2026, Microsoft Defender is named by 1,329 companies and CrowdStrike Falcon by 1,026; CrowdStrike Falcon skews to companies under 200 people (33% vs 33%), Microsoft Defender to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 37%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CrowdStrike Falcon's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Defender rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- CrowdStrike Falcon: 2–200 employees
- 33%
- Microsoft Defender: 2–200 employees
- 33%
- CrowdStrike Falcon: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Microsoft Defender: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.5 · 2.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | CrowdStrike Falcon | share | Microsoft Defender | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 19 | 2% | 17 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 74 | 7% | 56 | 4% | CrowdStrike Falcon |
| 11-50 employees | 93 | 9% | 123 | 9% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 175 | 17% | 253 | 19% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 172 | 17% | 231 | 17% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 117 | 11% | 176 | 13% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 176 | 17% | 253 | 19% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 71 | 7% | 70 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 129 | 13% | 150 | 11% | even |
| Segment | CrowdStrike Falcon | share | Microsoft Defender | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 471 | 46% | 466 | 35% | CrowdStrike Falcon |
| Business & finance services | 214 | 21% | 304 | 23% | Microsoft Defender |
| Manufacturing & industry | 104 | 10% | 189 | 14% | Microsoft Defender |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 34 | 3% | 51 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 32 | 3% | 26 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 26 | 3% | 49 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 26 | 3% | 53 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 24 | 2% | 40 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 24 | 2% | 44 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 22 | 2% | 38 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 16 | 2% | 34 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 15 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | – | – | 19 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CrowdStrike Falcon | share | Microsoft Defender | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 685 | 67% | 714 | 54% | CrowdStrike Falcon |
| United Kingdom | 78 | 8% | 114 | 9% | even |
| Canada | 36 | 4% | 54 | 4% | even |
| France | 24 | 2% | 34 | 3% | even |
| Germany | 22 | 2% | 87 | 7% | Microsoft Defender |
| India | 21 | 2% | 17 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 19 | 2% | 42 | 3% | even |
| Brazil | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 7 | 1% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 6 | 1% | 38 | 3% | Microsoft Defender |
| Belgium | – | – | 18 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 16 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 14 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CrowdStrike Falcon | share | Microsoft Defender | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 2,167 | 71% | 2,611 | 77% | Microsoft Defender |
| Sales | 197 | 6% | 79 | 2% | CrowdStrike Falcon |
| Software engineering | 144 | 5% | 98 | 3% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 46 | 2% | 46 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 36 | 1% | 46 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 35 | 1% | 36 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 35 | 1% | 23 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 28 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 15 | 0% | 17 | 1% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 12 | 0% | 18 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 12 | 0% | 25 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 8 | 0% | 11 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 6 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| public safety and protective services | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 4 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 3 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| arts media and entertainment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Retail & store operations | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using CrowdStrike Falcon →
Companies using Microsoft Defender →
endpoint protection edr ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft Defender is named by 1,329 companies in job postings and CrowdStrike Falcon by 1,026; 345 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/crowdstrike-falcon-vs-microsoft-defender)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender: questions
Which is more used, CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Defender?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Defender (1,329) over CrowdStrike Falcon (1,026). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Defender (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses CrowdStrike Falcon?
33% of CrowdStrike Falcon companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 33% for Microsoft Defender. 37% of CrowdStrike Falcon companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Microsoft Defender.
Do companies run both?
345 companies name both in their postings, usually CrowdStrike Falcon in marketing and Microsoft Defender in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Defender, and get 1,000 records free.