Compare · api specs data formats

CSV VS Model Context Protocol_

As of 30 October 2026, Model Context Protocol is named by 3,710 companies and CSV by 569; CSV skews to companies under 200 people (44% vs 42%), Model Context Protocol to companies over 1,000 (31% vs 32%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CSV's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Model Context Protocol rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

CSV: 2–200 employees
44%
Model Context Protocol: 2–200 employees
42%
CSV: 1,000+ employees
32%
Model Context Protocol: 1,000+ employees
31%
Postings per company, 90 days
1.7 · 3.2
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
569companies name CSV
3,710companies name Model Context Protocol
0name both
979 · 11,870postings in 90 days, CSV · Model Context Protocol
02 — Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentCSVshareModel Context ProtocolshareLeans
Self-employed92%642%even
2-10 employees417%2527%even
11-50 employees7613%49013%even
51-200 employees13424%80022%even
201-500 employees6812%54815%Model Context Protocol
501-1000 employees5810%40811%even
1001-5000 employees7914%61216%Model Context Protocol
5001-10000 employees356%1604%even
10,001+ employees6912%37610%even
By industry
SegmentCSVshareModel Context ProtocolshareLeans
Technology & software25946%1,93152%Model Context Protocol
Business & finance services11120%78121%even
Manufacturing & industry6111%2767%CSV
Commerce & trade254%993%even
Transport, logistics & rental193%501%even
Health care163%672%even
Utilities & infrastructure153%852%even
Property & construction132%481%even
Public, community & associations122%822%even
Consumer services & leisure122%852%even
Media & content112%1454%even
Automotive102%301%even
By country
SegmentCSVshareModel Context ProtocolshareLeans
United States35462%2,39164%Model Context Protocol
Germany488%2126%CSV
United Kingdom346%2858%even
France244%1033%even
Canada234%1063%even
Spain112%331%even
Brazil92%321%even
Australia81%411%even
India71%521%even
Poland61%321%even
Italy51%––outside top 12
Austria41%––outside top 12
Netherlands––521%outside top 12
Sweden––421%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentCSVshareModel Context ProtocolshareLeans
Software engineering37129%4,10128%even
Data & AI33426%4,80533%Model Context Protocol
IT operations & business systems13110%1,44010%even
Engineering (non-software)413%2051%even
Product, program & project management403%6595%even
Customer service & success252%1461%even
Sales161%4613%even
Finance & accounting121%630%even
Marketing & communications121%1711%even
Quality, safety & environment121%––outside top 12
Administration & office81%––outside top 12
General management & consulting60%761%even
Design & UX––1091%outside top 12
Business development & strategy––620%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Model Context Protocol is named by 3,710 companies in job postings and CSV by 569; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/csv-vs-model-context-protocol)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

CSV vs Model Context Protocol: questions

Which is more used, CSV or Model Context Protocol?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Model Context Protocol (3,710) over CSV (569). By website-and-DNS footprint, Model Context Protocol (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses CSV?

44% of CSV companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 42% for Model Context Protocol. 32% of CSV companies have over 1,000 employees, against 31% for Model Context Protocol.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually CSV in marketing and Model Context Protocol in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on CSV or Model Context Protocol, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free