Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DECyberArk VS Google Secret Manager_
As of 4 November 2026, Google Secret Manager is named by 135 companies and CyberArk by 503; CyberArk skews to companies under 200 people (19% vs 33%), Google Secret Manager to companies over 1,000 (40% vs 60%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CyberArk's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Google Secret Manager rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- CyberArk: 2–200 employees
- 19%
- Google Secret Manager: 2–200 employees
- 33%
- CyberArk: 1,000+ employees
- 60%
- Google Secret Manager: 1,000+ employees
- 40%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 4.1 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | CyberArk | share | Google Secret Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 8 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 24 | 5% | 12 | 9% | Google Secret Manager |
| 11-50 employees | 33 | 7% | 13 | 10% | Google Secret Manager |
| 51-200 employees | 41 | 8% | 20 | 15% | Google Secret Manager |
| 201-500 employees | 47 | 9% | 17 | 13% | Google Secret Manager |
| 501-1000 employees | 46 | 9% | 16 | 12% | Google Secret Manager |
| 1001-5000 employees | 109 | 22% | 12 | 9% | CyberArk |
| 5001-10000 employees | 54 | 11% | 10 | 7% | CyberArk |
| 10,001+ employees | 141 | 28% | 32 | 24% | CyberArk |
| Segment | CyberArk | share | Google Secret Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 178 | 35% | 34 | 25% | CyberArk |
| Technology & software | 153 | 30% | 66 | 49% | Google Secret Manager |
| Manufacturing & industry | 57 | 11% | 14 | 10% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 21 | 4% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 15 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 15 | 3% | 1 | 1% | CyberArk |
| Health care | 12 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 10 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 9 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 9 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CyberArk | share | Google Secret Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 294 | 58% | 87 | 64% | Google Secret Manager |
| United Kingdom | 34 | 7% | 11 | 8% | even |
| France | 19 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 17 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 15 | 3% | 1 | 1% | CyberArk |
| Singapore | 12 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 11 | 2% | 6 | 4% | Google Secret Manager |
| Brazil | 9 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| India | 8 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CyberArk | share | Google Secret Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 1,519 | 62% | 79 | 21% | CyberArk |
| Software engineering | 273 | 11% | 187 | 49% | Google Secret Manager |
| Data & AI | 94 | 4% | 48 | 13% | Google Secret Manager |
| Product, program & project management | 75 | 3% | 2 | 1% | CyberArk |
| Sales | 61 | 2% | 1 | 0% | CyberArk |
| Engineering (non-software) | 27 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 20 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 17 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 12 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 9 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Retail & store operations | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using CyberArk →
Companies using Google Secret Manager →
privileged access secrets ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Google Secret Manager is named by 135 companies in job postings and CyberArk by 503; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/cyberark-vs-google-secret-manager)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
CyberArk vs Google Secret Manager: questions
Which is more used, CyberArk or Google Secret Manager?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, CyberArk (503) over Google Secret Manager (135). By website-and-DNS footprint, Google Secret Manager (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses CyberArk?
19% of CyberArk companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 33% for Google Secret Manager. 60% of CyberArk companies have over 1,000 employees, against 40% for Google Secret Manager.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually CyberArk in marketing and Google Secret Manager in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on CyberArk or Google Secret Manager, and get 1,000 records free.