Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEDiligent Boards VS SAP GRC_
As of 4 November 2026, SAP GRC is named by 157 companies and Diligent Boards by 105; Diligent Boards skews to companies under 200 people (13% vs 18%), SAP GRC to companies over 1,000 (68% vs 66%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Diligent Boards's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAP GRC rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Diligent Boards: 2–200 employees
- 13%
- SAP GRC: 2–200 employees
- 18%
- Diligent Boards: 1,000+ employees
- 66%
- SAP GRC: 1,000+ employees
- 68%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.2 · 3.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Diligent Boards | share | SAP GRC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Diligent Boards |
| 2-10 employees | 1 | 1% | 6 | 4% | SAP GRC |
| 11-50 employees | 6 | 6% | 9 | 6% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 7 | 7% | 13 | 8% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 10 | 10% | 14 | 9% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 9 | 9% | 8 | 5% | Diligent Boards |
| 1001-5000 employees | 26 | 25% | 27 | 17% | Diligent Boards |
| 5001-10000 employees | 13 | 12% | 13 | 8% | Diligent Boards |
| 10,001+ employees | 30 | 29% | 66 | 42% | SAP GRC |
| Segment | Diligent Boards | share | SAP GRC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 49 | 47% | 19 | 12% | Diligent Boards |
| Manufacturing & industry | 19 | 18% | 63 | 40% | SAP GRC |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 9 | 9% | 6 | 4% | Diligent Boards |
| Commerce & trade | 7 | 7% | 12 | 8% | even |
| Property & construction | 6 | 6% | 5 | 3% | Diligent Boards |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 5% | 3 | 2% | Diligent Boards |
| Health care | 4 | 4% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Technology & software | 2 | 2% | 29 | 18% | SAP GRC |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 6 | 4% | SAP GRC |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Diligent Boards | share | SAP GRC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 69 | 66% | 84 | 54% | Diligent Boards |
| Canada | 10 | 10% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 10% | 5 | 3% | Diligent Boards |
| Australia | 4 | 4% | 1 | 1% | Diligent Boards |
| Germany | 2 | 2% | 12 | 8% | SAP GRC |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Estonia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| MY | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% | 6 | 4% | SAP GRC |
| Norway | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 6 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Diligent Boards | share | SAP GRC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal, compliance & risk | 54 | 38% | 33 | 5% | Diligent Boards |
| Administration & office | 40 | 28% | 1 | 0% | Diligent Boards |
| Finance & accounting | 15 | 11% | 28 | 5% | Diligent Boards |
| IT operations & business systems | 4 | 3% | 433 | 71% | SAP GRC |
| Business development & strategy | 3 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 3 | 2% | 12 | 2% | even |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | – | – | 16 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| agriculture and environment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Diligent Boards →
Companies using SAP GRC →
grc audit ethics ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAP GRC is named by 157 companies in job postings and Diligent Boards by 105; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/diligent-vs-sap-grc)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Diligent Boards vs SAP GRC: questions
Which is more used, Diligent Boards or SAP GRC?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, SAP GRC (157) over Diligent Boards (105). By website-and-DNS footprint, SAP GRC (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Diligent Boards?
13% of Diligent Boards companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 18% for SAP GRC. 66% of Diligent Boards companies have over 1,000 employees, against 68% for SAP GRC.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Diligent Boards in marketing and SAP GRC in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Diligent Boards or SAP GRC, and get 1,000 records free.