Compare · api specs data formats

UN/EDIFACT VS GraphQL_

As of 30 October 2026, GraphQL is named by 3,097 companies and UN/EDIFACT by 182; UN/EDIFACT skews to companies under 200 people (28% vs 55%), GraphQL to companies over 1,000 (24% vs 47%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: UN/EDIFACT's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, GraphQL rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

UN/EDIFACT: 2–200 employees
28%
GraphQL: 2–200 employees
55%
UN/EDIFACT: 1,000+ employees
47%
GraphQL: 1,000+ employees
24%
Postings per company, 90 days
1.9 · 2.5
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
182companies name UN/EDIFACT
3,097companies name GraphQL
0name both
342 · 7,674postings in 90 days, UN/EDIFACT · GraphQL
02 — Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentUN/EDIFACTshareGraphQLshareLeans
Self-employed42%441%even
2-10 employees95%31010%GraphQL
11-50 employees1810%73124%GraphQL
51-200 employees2413%64921%GraphQL
201-500 employees2413%39113%even
501-1000 employees1810%2418%UN/EDIFACT
1001-5000 employees3821%38112%UN/EDIFACT
5001-10000 employees137%873%UN/EDIFACT
10,001+ employees3419%2638%UN/EDIFACT
By industry
SegmentUN/EDIFACTshareGraphQLshareLeans
Technology & software5731%1,78958%GraphQL
Transport, logistics & rental3419%381%UN/EDIFACT
Manufacturing & industry3318%2027%UN/EDIFACT
Utilities & infrastructure158%421%UN/EDIFACT
Business & finance services148%55418%GraphQL
Automotive74%311%UN/EDIFACT
Commerce & trade74%973%even
Consumer services & leisure32%742%even
Hospitality & travel32%331%even
Media & content32%1104%even
Health care21%431%even
Property & construction21%––outside top 12
Public, community & associations––502%outside top 12
By country
SegmentUN/EDIFACTshareGraphQLshareLeans
United States8547%1,83959%GraphQL
Germany5128%1705%UN/EDIFACT
France105%732%UN/EDIFACT
Canada63%702%even
United Kingdom53%2147%GraphQL
Netherlands42%421%even
Australia32%371%even
Austria21%––outside top 12
Italy21%––outside top 12
Sweden21%361%even
Brazil11%351%even
Switzerland11%––outside top 12
India––1485%outside top 12
Poland––441%outside top 12
Singapore––341%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentUN/EDIFACTshareGraphQLshareLeans
Software engineering13027%8,34075%GraphQL
IT operations & business systems12727%5125%UN/EDIFACT
Product, program & project management214%1251%UN/EDIFACT
Data & AI123%7277%GraphQL
General management & consulting92%––outside top 12
Customer service & success51%691%even
Finance & accounting51%––outside top 12
Sales51%1101%even
Marketing & communications41%170%even
skilled trades and field service41%––outside top 12
procurement and purchasing31%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)20%1151%even
Unclassified––220%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––160%outside top 12
Design & UX––130%outside top 12
arts media and entertainment––100%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

GraphQL is named by 3,097 companies in job postings and UN/EDIFACT by 182; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/edifact-vs-graphql)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

UN/EDIFACT vs GraphQL: questions

Which is more used, UN/EDIFACT or GraphQL?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, GraphQL (3,097) over UN/EDIFACT (182). By website-and-DNS footprint, GraphQL (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses UN/EDIFACT?

28% of UN/EDIFACT companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 55% for GraphQL. 47% of UN/EDIFACT companies have over 1,000 employees, against 24% for GraphQL.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually UN/EDIFACT in marketing and GraphQL in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on UN/EDIFACT or GraphQL, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free