Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEFHIR VS SNOMED CT_
As of 4 November 2026, SNOMED CT is named by 164 companies and FHIR by 1,012; FHIR skews to companies under 200 people (47% vs 47%), SNOMED CT to companies over 1,000 (34% vs 31%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: FHIR's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SNOMED CT rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- FHIR: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- SNOMED CT: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- FHIR: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- SNOMED CT: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.4 · 1.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | FHIR | share | SNOMED CT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 19 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 102 | 10% | 16 | 10% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 159 | 16% | 20 | 12% | FHIR |
| 51-200 employees | 211 | 21% | 41 | 25% | SNOMED CT |
| 201-500 employees | 117 | 12% | 15 | 9% | FHIR |
| 501-1000 employees | 87 | 9% | 12 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 164 | 16% | 27 | 16% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 45 | 4% | 8 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 108 | 11% | 21 | 13% | SNOMED CT |
| Segment | FHIR | share | SNOMED CT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 553 | 55% | 89 | 54% | even |
| Health care | 214 | 21% | 29 | 18% | FHIR |
| Business & finance services | 123 | 12% | 20 | 12% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 48 | 5% | 10 | 6% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 37 | 4% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 19 | 2% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 10 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | FHIR | share | SNOMED CT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 727 | 72% | 120 | 73% | even |
| Germany | 57 | 6% | 5 | 3% | FHIR |
| United Kingdom | 42 | 4% | 9 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 30 | 3% | 6 | 4% | even |
| India | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 9 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 8 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| France | 8 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 7 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 7 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| NG | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | FHIR | share | SNOMED CT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 1,034 | 33% | 43 | 12% | FHIR |
| Data & AI | 585 | 19% | 138 | 38% | SNOMED CT |
| Product, program & project management | 330 | 11% | 21 | 6% | FHIR |
| IT operations & business systems | 328 | 11% | 25 | 7% | FHIR |
| Sales | 83 | 3% | 3 | 1% | even |
| healthcare clinical | 37 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 32 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 31 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| research and science | 26 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 21 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 16 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 13 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 12 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 12 | 0% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Design & UX | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 3 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| arts media and entertainment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | 7 | 2% | even |
| construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using FHIR →
Companies using SNOMED CT →
healthcare interoperability ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SNOMED CT is named by 164 companies in job postings and FHIR by 1,012; 142 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/fhir-vs-snomed-ct)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FHIR vs SNOMED CT: questions
Which is more used, FHIR or SNOMED CT?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, FHIR (1,012) over SNOMED CT (164). By website-and-DNS footprint, SNOMED CT (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses FHIR?
47% of FHIR companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 47% for SNOMED CT. 31% of FHIR companies have over 1,000 employees, against 34% for SNOMED CT.
Do companies run both?
142 companies name both in their postings, usually FHIR in marketing and SNOMED CT in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on FHIR or SNOMED CT, and get 1,000 records free.