Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEGhidra VS Magnet AXIOM_
As of 4 November 2026, Magnet AXIOM is named by 179 companies and Ghidra by 190; Ghidra skews to companies under 200 people (51% vs 30%), Magnet AXIOM to companies over 1,000 (52% vs 25%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Ghidra's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Magnet AXIOM rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Ghidra: 2–200 employees
- 51%
- Magnet AXIOM: 2–200 employees
- 30%
- Ghidra: 1,000+ employees
- 25%
- Magnet AXIOM: 1,000+ employees
- 52%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.0 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Ghidra | share | Magnet AXIOM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 7 | 4% | 4 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 17 | 9% | 8 | 4% | Ghidra |
| 11-50 employees | 25 | 13% | 13 | 7% | Ghidra |
| 51-200 employees | 54 | 28% | 33 | 18% | Ghidra |
| 201-500 employees | 22 | 12% | 14 | 8% | Ghidra |
| 501-1000 employees | 18 | 9% | 14 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 19 | 10% | 43 | 24% | Magnet AXIOM |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 6% | 15 | 8% | Magnet AXIOM |
| 10,001+ employees | 17 | 9% | 35 | 20% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Segment | Ghidra | share | Magnet AXIOM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 108 | 57% | 44 | 25% | Ghidra |
| Business & finance services | 25 | 13% | 55 | 31% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Manufacturing & industry | 21 | 11% | 12 | 7% | Ghidra |
| Consumer services & leisure | 11 | 6% | 11 | 6% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 8 | 4% | 7 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 5 | 3% | 7 | 4% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 33 | 18% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ghidra | share | Magnet AXIOM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 153 | 81% | 134 | 75% | Ghidra |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 7% | 10 | 6% | even |
| Germany | 5 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| India | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Romania | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Cyprus | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| South Korea | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Latvia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| PH | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | – | – | 6 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| DZ | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ghidra | share | Magnet AXIOM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 433 | 56% | 130 | 17% | Ghidra |
| Software engineering | 141 | 18% | 24 | 3% | Ghidra |
| Engineering (non-software) | 19 | 2% | 42 | 6% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 10 | 1% | 75 | 10% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Data & AI | 6 | 1% | 24 | 3% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 1% | 26 | 3% | Magnet AXIOM |
| public safety and protective services | 2 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 2 | 0% | 15 | 2% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 6 | 1% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 99 | 13% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 33 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | – | – | 26 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 22 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 18 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 13 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Ghidra →
Companies using Magnet AXIOM →
offensive security forensics ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Magnet AXIOM is named by 179 companies in job postings and Ghidra by 190; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ghidra-vs-magnet-axiom)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Ghidra vs Magnet AXIOM: questions
Which is more used, Ghidra or Magnet AXIOM?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Ghidra (190) over Magnet AXIOM (179). By website-and-DNS footprint, Magnet AXIOM (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Ghidra?
51% of Ghidra companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 30% for Magnet AXIOM. 25% of Ghidra companies have over 1,000 employees, against 52% for Magnet AXIOM.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Ghidra in marketing and Magnet AXIOM in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Ghidra or Magnet AXIOM, and get 1,000 records free.