Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEGoogle Cloud Spanner VS Microsoft Access_
As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft Access is named by 987 companies and Google Cloud Spanner by 112; Google Cloud Spanner skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 26%), Microsoft Access to companies over 1,000 (53% vs 37%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Google Cloud Spanner's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Access rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Google Cloud Spanner: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- Microsoft Access: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- Google Cloud Spanner: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Microsoft Access: 1,000+ employees
- 53%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.5 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Google Cloud Spanner | share | Microsoft Access | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 2 | 2% | 30 | 3% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 12 | 11% | 92 | 9% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 25 | 22% | 133 | 13% | Google Cloud Spanner |
| 201-500 employees | 21 | 19% | 118 | 12% | Google Cloud Spanner |
| 501-1000 employees | 9 | 8% | 90 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 15 | 13% | 194 | 20% | Microsoft Access |
| 5001-10000 employees | 8 | 7% | 84 | 9% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 18 | 16% | 241 | 24% | Microsoft Access |
| Segment | Google Cloud Spanner | share | Microsoft Access | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 68 | 61% | 165 | 17% | Google Cloud Spanner |
| Business & finance services | 21 | 19% | 249 | 25% | Microsoft Access |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 4% | 28 | 3% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 4 | 4% | 187 | 19% | Microsoft Access |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 3% | 48 | 5% | Microsoft Access |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 3% | 51 | 5% | Microsoft Access |
| Media & content | 3 | 3% | 28 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 2% | 33 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 23 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 31 | 3% | Microsoft Access |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | 50 | 5% | Microsoft Access |
| Health care | – | – | 85 | 9% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Google Cloud Spanner | share | Microsoft Access | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 80 | 71% | 753 | 76% | Microsoft Access |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% | 47 | 5% | even |
| Singapore | 4 | 4% | 8 | 1% | Google Cloud Spanner |
| Germany | 3 | 3% | 32 | 3% | even |
| India | 3 | 3% | 6 | 1% | Google Cloud Spanner |
| Japan | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 44 | 4% | Microsoft Access |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| France | – | – | 12 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Google Cloud Spanner | share | Microsoft Access | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 183 | 47% | 139 | 4% | Google Cloud Spanner |
| Data & AI | 76 | 20% | 281 | 7% | Google Cloud Spanner |
| IT operations & business systems | 57 | 15% | 262 | 7% | Google Cloud Spanner |
| Sales | 18 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 2 | 1% | 290 | 8% | Microsoft Access |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 2 | 1% | 175 | 5% | Microsoft Access |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 1% | 167 | 4% | Microsoft Access |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | 65 | 2% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 700 | 18% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 146 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 129 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 106 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | – | – | 66 | 2% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Google Cloud Spanner →
Companies using Microsoft Access →
relational databases ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft Access is named by 987 companies in job postings and Google Cloud Spanner by 112; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/google-cloud-spanner-vs-microsoft-access)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Google Cloud Spanner vs Microsoft Access: questions
Which is more used, Google Cloud Spanner or Microsoft Access?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Access (987) over Google Cloud Spanner (112). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Access (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Google Cloud Spanner?
35% of Google Cloud Spanner companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 26% for Microsoft Access. 37% of Google Cloud Spanner companies have over 1,000 employees, against 53% for Microsoft Access.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Google Cloud Spanner in marketing and Microsoft Access in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Google Cloud Spanner or Microsoft Access, and get 1,000 records free.