Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEGoogle SecOps VS IBM QRadar_
As of 4 November 2026, IBM QRadar is named by 327 companies and Google SecOps by 120; Google SecOps skews to companies under 200 people (29% vs 38%), IBM QRadar to companies over 1,000 (37% vs 48%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Google SecOps's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, IBM QRadar rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Google SecOps: 2–200 employees
- 29%
- IBM QRadar: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Google SecOps: 1,000+ employees
- 48%
- IBM QRadar: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.5 · 2.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Google SecOps | share | IBM QRadar | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 9 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 5 | 4% | 31 | 9% | IBM QRadar |
| 11-50 employees | 14 | 12% | 41 | 13% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 16 | 13% | 51 | 16% | IBM QRadar |
| 201-500 employees | 13 | 11% | 47 | 14% | IBM QRadar |
| 501-1000 employees | 14 | 12% | 27 | 8% | Google SecOps |
| 1001-5000 employees | 25 | 21% | 63 | 19% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 8 | 7% | 14 | 4% | Google SecOps |
| 10,001+ employees | 24 | 20% | 44 | 13% | Google SecOps |
| Segment | Google SecOps | share | IBM QRadar | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 47 | 39% | 184 | 56% | IBM QRadar |
| Business & finance services | 34 | 28% | 64 | 20% | Google SecOps |
| Manufacturing & industry | 10 | 8% | 23 | 7% | even |
| Media & content | 8 | 7% | 8 | 2% | Google SecOps |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 6% | 13 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 3% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | 18 | 6% | IBM QRadar |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Google SecOps | share | IBM QRadar | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 69 | 57% | 166 | 51% | Google SecOps |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 11% | 26 | 8% | Google SecOps |
| Brazil | 5 | 4% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 4 | 3% | 11 | 3% | even |
| France | 4 | 3% | 23 | 7% | IBM QRadar |
| Canada | 3 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Denmark | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 3 | 3% | 19 | 6% | IBM QRadar |
| Singapore | 3 | 3% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Google SecOps | share | IBM QRadar | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 377 | 77% | 750 | 72% | Google SecOps |
| Sales | 22 | 4% | 23 | 2% | Google SecOps |
| Software engineering | 17 | 3% | 27 | 3% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 6 | 1% | 24 | 2% | even |
| Data & AI | 4 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 4 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 3 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 2 | 0% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 10 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| public safety and protective services | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Google SecOps →
Companies using IBM QRadar →
siem soar threat intel ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
IBM QRadar is named by 327 companies in job postings and Google SecOps by 120; 35 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/google-secops-vs-ibm-qradar)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Google SecOps vs IBM QRadar: questions
Which is more used, Google SecOps or IBM QRadar?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, IBM QRadar (327) over Google SecOps (120). By website-and-DNS footprint, IBM QRadar (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Google SecOps?
29% of Google SecOps companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for IBM QRadar. 48% of Google SecOps companies have over 1,000 employees, against 37% for IBM QRadar.
Do companies run both?
35 companies name both in their postings, usually Google SecOps in marketing and IBM QRadar in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Google SecOps or IBM QRadar, and get 1,000 records free.