Compare · api specs data formats

GraphQL VS Protocol Buffers_

As of 30 October 2026, Protocol Buffers is named by 431 companies and GraphQL by 3,097; GraphQL skews to companies under 200 people (55% vs 46%), Protocol Buffers to companies over 1,000 (26% vs 24%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: GraphQL's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Protocol Buffers rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

GraphQL: 2–200 employees
55%
Protocol Buffers: 2–200 employees
46%
GraphQL: 1,000+ employees
24%
Protocol Buffers: 1,000+ employees
26%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.5 · 2.1
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
3,097companies name GraphQL
431companies name Protocol Buffers
0name both
7,674 · 904postings in 90 days, GraphQL · Protocol Buffers
02 — Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGraphQLshareProtocol BuffersshareLeans
Self-employed441%61%even
2-10 employees31010%379%even
11-50 employees73124%6114%GraphQL
51-200 employees64921%9923%Protocol Buffers
201-500 employees39113%7317%Protocol Buffers
501-1000 employees2418%4110%even
1001-5000 employees38112%6515%Protocol Buffers
5001-10000 employees873%133%even
10,001+ employees2638%368%even
By industry
SegmentGraphQLshareProtocol BuffersshareLeans
Technology & software1,78958%20548%GraphQL
Business & finance services55418%7918%even
Manufacturing & industry2027%7718%Protocol Buffers
Media & content1104%184%even
Commerce & trade973%92%even
Consumer services & leisure742%61%even
Public, community & associations502%61%even
Health care431%31%even
Utilities & infrastructure421%82%even
Transport, logistics & rental381%123%even
Hospitality & travel331%20%even
Automotive311%41%even
By country
SegmentGraphQLshareProtocol BuffersshareLeans
United States1,83959%28867%Protocol Buffers
United Kingdom2147%327%even
Germany1705%256%even
India1485%72%GraphQL
France732%92%even
Canada702%61%even
Poland441%51%even
Netherlands421%41%even
Australia371%––outside top 12
Sweden361%51%even
Brazil351%41%even
Singapore341%––outside top 12
Japan––51%outside top 12
Switzerland––41%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGraphQLshareProtocol BuffersshareLeans
Software engineering8,34075%94075%even
Data & AI7277%1079%even
IT operations & business systems5125%302%GraphQL
Product, program & project management1251%50%even
Engineering (non-software)1151%343%even
Sales1101%20%even
Customer service & success691%40%even
Unclassified220%10%even
Marketing & communications170%40%even
Quality, safety & environment160%––outside top 12
Design & UX130%––outside top 12
arts media and entertainment100%10%even
Finance & accounting––20%outside top 12
construction and civil––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Protocol Buffers is named by 431 companies in job postings and GraphQL by 3,097; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/graphql-vs-protocol-buffers)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

GraphQL vs Protocol Buffers: questions

Which is more used, GraphQL or Protocol Buffers?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, GraphQL (3,097) over Protocol Buffers (431). By website-and-DNS footprint, Protocol Buffers (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses GraphQL?

55% of GraphQL companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 46% for Protocol Buffers. 24% of GraphQL companies have over 1,000 employees, against 26% for Protocol Buffers.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually GraphQL in marketing and Protocol Buffers in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on GraphQL or Protocol Buffers, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free