Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEGroup Policy VS Microsoft Configuration Manager_
As of 4 November 2026, Microsoft Configuration Manager is named by 1,353 companies and Group Policy by 1,679; Group Policy skews to companies under 200 people (32% vs 24%), Microsoft Configuration Manager to companies over 1,000 (52% vs 38%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Group Policy's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Configuration Manager rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Group Policy: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- Microsoft Configuration Manager: 2–200 employees
- 24%
- Group Policy: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Microsoft Configuration Manager: 1,000+ employees
- 52%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Microsoft Configuration Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 19 | 1% | 20 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 75 | 4% | 48 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 151 | 9% | 99 | 7% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 303 | 18% | 175 | 13% | Group Policy |
| 201-500 employees | 284 | 17% | 151 | 11% | Group Policy |
| 501-1000 employees | 209 | 12% | 155 | 11% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 298 | 18% | 321 | 24% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| 5001-10000 employees | 97 | 6% | 105 | 8% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 243 | 14% | 279 | 21% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Microsoft Configuration Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 492 | 29% | 406 | 30% | even |
| Business & finance services | 339 | 20% | 293 | 22% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 291 | 17% | 208 | 15% | even |
| Health care | 117 | 7% | 64 | 5% | Group Policy |
| Public, community & associations | 82 | 5% | 65 | 5% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 66 | 4% | 47 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 61 | 4% | 48 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 55 | 3% | 78 | 6% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| Property & construction | 52 | 3% | 45 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 39 | 2% | 24 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 34 | 2% | 30 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 33 | 2% | 25 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Microsoft Configuration Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,053 | 63% | 808 | 60% | Group Policy |
| United Kingdom | 84 | 5% | 89 | 7% | even |
| Germany | 73 | 4% | 53 | 4% | even |
| France | 66 | 4% | 39 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 53 | 3% | 38 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 25 | 1% | 24 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 23 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 19 | 1% | 17 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 16 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 16 | 1% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 14 | 1% | 19 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 12 | 1% | 21 | 2% | even |
| Austria | – | – | 17 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 16 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Microsoft Configuration Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 3,044 | 71% | 3,401 | 63% | Group Policy |
| Engineering (non-software) | 247 | 6% | 221 | 4% | even |
| Software engineering | 123 | 3% | 205 | 4% | even |
| Customer service & success | 107 | 2% | 142 | 3% | even |
| Sales | 62 | 1% | 52 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 40 | 1% | 78 | 1% | even |
| procurement and purchasing | 32 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 24 | 1% | 47 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 16 | 0% | 15 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 15 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 14 | 0% | 23 | 0% | even |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 13 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 11 | 0% | 62 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 8 | 0% | 21 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 7 | 0% | 12 | 0% | even |
| arts media and entertainment | 6 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 5 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| healthcare clinical | 5 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| healthcare support and caregiving | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 5 | 0% | 7 | 0% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 4 | 0% | 16 | 0% | even |
| hospitality and food service | 4 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 4 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 0% | 26 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 2 | 0% | 7 | 0% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 2 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| real estate and property | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Group Policy →
Companies using Microsoft Configuration Manager →
endpoint management uem ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft Configuration Manager is named by 1,353 companies in job postings and Group Policy by 1,679; 477 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/group-policy-vs-microsoft-configuration-manager)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Group Policy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager: questions
Which is more used, Group Policy or Microsoft Configuration Manager?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Group Policy (1,679) over Microsoft Configuration Manager (1,353). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Configuration Manager (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Group Policy?
32% of Group Policy companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 24% for Microsoft Configuration Manager. 38% of Group Policy companies have over 1,000 employees, against 52% for Microsoft Configuration Manager.
Do companies run both?
477 companies name both in their postings, usually Group Policy in marketing and Microsoft Configuration Manager in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Group Policy or Microsoft Configuration Manager, and get 1,000 records free.