Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEgRPC VS Model Context Protocol_
As of 4 November 2026, Model Context Protocol is named by 4,892 companies and gRPC by 1,753; gRPC skews to companies under 200 people (45% vs 41%), Model Context Protocol to companies over 1,000 (31% vs 30%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: gRPC's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Model Context Protocol rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- gRPC: 2–200 employees
- 45%
- Model Context Protocol: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- gRPC: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- Model Context Protocol: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.6 · 3.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | gRPC | share | Model Context Protocol | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 61 | 3% | 168 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 180 | 10% | 390 | 8% | gRPC |
| 11-50 employees | 264 | 15% | 618 | 13% | gRPC |
| 51-200 employees | 337 | 19% | 1,020 | 21% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 229 | 13% | 686 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 152 | 9% | 514 | 11% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 249 | 14% | 783 | 16% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 76 | 4% | 207 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 205 | 12% | 506 | 10% | even |
| Segment | gRPC | share | Model Context Protocol | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 920 | 52% | 2,453 | 50% | gRPC |
| Business & finance services | 312 | 18% | 1,048 | 21% | Model Context Protocol |
| Manufacturing & industry | 221 | 13% | 368 | 8% | gRPC |
| Media & content | 68 | 4% | 210 | 4% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 50 | 3% | 112 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 31 | 2% | 144 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 31 | 2% | 68 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 30 | 2% | 131 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 26 | 1% | 116 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 24 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 18 | 1% | 70 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 12 | 1% | 44 | 1% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 81 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | gRPC | share | Model Context Protocol | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,110 | 63% | 3,059 | 63% | even |
| United Kingdom | 117 | 7% | 347 | 7% | even |
| Germany | 74 | 4% | 264 | 5% | even |
| India | 43 | 2% | 73 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 26 | 1% | 138 | 3% | even |
| France | 26 | 1% | 123 | 3% | even |
| Sweden | 22 | 1% | 59 | 1% | even |
| Singapore | 21 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 18 | 1% | 62 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 17 | 1% | 39 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 16 | 1% | 53 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 16 | 1% | 61 | 1% | even |
| Spain | – | – | 50 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | gRPC | share | Model Context Protocol | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 4,321 | 72% | 5,244 | 28% | gRPC |
| Data & AI | 538 | 9% | 6,055 | 32% | Model Context Protocol |
| IT operations & business systems | 254 | 4% | 2,527 | 13% | Model Context Protocol |
| Engineering (non-software) | 136 | 2% | 266 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 58 | 1% | 782 | 4% | Model Context Protocol |
| Sales | 31 | 1% | 559 | 3% | Model Context Protocol |
| Unclassified | 26 | 0% | 65 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 17 | 0% | 28 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 10 | 0% | 190 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 8 | 0% | 220 | 1% | even |
| construction and civil | 6 | 0% | 22 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 5 | 0% | 92 | 0% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 4 | 0% | 32 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 3 | 0% | 130 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 2 | 0% | 28 | 0% | even |
| research and science | 2 | 0% | 15 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | 72 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | 19 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 74 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 23 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 16 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| public safety and protective services | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| real estate and property | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| social care and community | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using gRPC →
Companies using Model Context Protocol →
api specs data formats ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Model Context Protocol is named by 4,892 companies in job postings and gRPC by 1,753; 221 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/grpc-vs-model-context-protocol)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
gRPC vs Model Context Protocol: questions
Which is more used, gRPC or Model Context Protocol?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Model Context Protocol (4,892) over gRPC (1,753). By website-and-DNS footprint, Model Context Protocol (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses gRPC?
45% of gRPC companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 41% for Model Context Protocol. 30% of gRPC companies have over 1,000 employees, against 31% for Model Context Protocol.
Do companies run both?
221 companies name both in their postings, usually gRPC in marketing and Model Context Protocol in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on gRPC or Model Context Protocol, and get 1,000 records free.