Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEIBM DOORS VS Sparx Enterprise Architect_
As of 4 November 2026, Sparx Enterprise Architect is named by 526 companies and IBM DOORS by 638; IBM DOORS skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 40%), Sparx Enterprise Architect to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 36%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: IBM DOORS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Sparx Enterprise Architect rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- IBM DOORS: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- Sparx Enterprise Architect: 2–200 employees
- 40%
- IBM DOORS: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Sparx Enterprise Architect: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 7.6 · 3.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 15 | 2% | 16 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 49 | 8% | 38 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 77 | 12% | 60 | 11% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 123 | 19% | 110 | 21% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 92 | 14% | 57 | 11% | IBM DOORS |
| 501-1000 employees | 54 | 8% | 57 | 11% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| 1001-5000 employees | 83 | 13% | 92 | 17% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| 5001-10000 employees | 37 | 6% | 23 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 108 | 17% | 73 | 14% | IBM DOORS |
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 275 | 43% | 102 | 19% | IBM DOORS |
| Business & finance services | 123 | 19% | 107 | 20% | even |
| Technology & software | 107 | 17% | 217 | 41% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Automotive | 48 | 8% | 20 | 4% | IBM DOORS |
| Property & construction | 16 | 3% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 16 | 3% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 14 | 2% | 19 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 12 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 12 | 2% | 15 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 1% | 15 | 3% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Health care | 3 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 374 | 59% | 222 | 42% | IBM DOORS |
| Germany | 56 | 9% | 53 | 10% | even |
| United Kingdom | 42 | 7% | 43 | 8% | even |
| France | 32 | 5% | 19 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 19 | 3% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 14 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 10 | 2% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 8 | 1% | 8 | 2% | even |
| India | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 7 | 1% | 15 | 3% | even |
| Belgium | 6 | 1% | 15 | 3% | even |
| Italy | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 38 | 7% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 17 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 3,911 | 68% | 336 | 16% | IBM DOORS |
| Software engineering | 608 | 11% | 290 | 14% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| IT operations & business systems | 209 | 4% | 1,046 | 49% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Quality, safety & environment | 146 | 3% | 9 | 0% | IBM DOORS |
| Product, program & project management | 102 | 2% | 23 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 28 | 0% | 108 | 5% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Administration & office | 27 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 16 | 0% | 20 | 1% | even |
| construction and civil | 8 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 8 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| arts media and entertainment | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 6 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 4 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 0% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Travel, leisure & events | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 14 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using IBM DOORS →
Companies using Sparx Enterprise Architect →
requirements mbse ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Sparx Enterprise Architect is named by 526 companies in job postings and IBM DOORS by 638; 96 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ibm-doors-vs-sparx-enterprise-architect)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
IBM DOORS vs Sparx Enterprise Architect: questions
Which is more used, IBM DOORS or Sparx Enterprise Architect?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, IBM DOORS (638) over Sparx Enterprise Architect (526). By website-and-DNS footprint, Sparx Enterprise Architect (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses IBM DOORS?
39% of IBM DOORS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 40% for Sparx Enterprise Architect. 36% of IBM DOORS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Sparx Enterprise Architect.
Do companies run both?
96 companies name both in their postings, usually IBM DOORS in marketing and Sparx Enterprise Architect in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on IBM DOORS or Sparx Enterprise Architect, and get 1,000 records free.