Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEIDEXX VS Thermo Fisher Scientific_
As of 4 November 2026, Thermo Fisher Scientific is named by 100 companies and IDEXX by 134; IDEXX skews to companies under 200 people (68% vs 28%), Thermo Fisher Scientific to companies over 1,000 (49% vs 16%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: IDEXX's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Thermo Fisher Scientific rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- IDEXX: 2–200 employees
- 68%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific: 2–200 employees
- 28%
- IDEXX: 1,000+ employees
- 16%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific: 1,000+ employees
- 49%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 7.9 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | IDEXX | share | Thermo Fisher Scientific | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 39 | 29% | 4 | 4% | IDEXX |
| 11-50 employees | 36 | 27% | 7 | 7% | IDEXX |
| 51-200 employees | 16 | 12% | 17 | 17% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| 201-500 employees | 15 | 11% | 10 | 10% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 7 | 5% | 12 | 12% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| 1001-5000 employees | 10 | 7% | 12 | 12% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| 5001-10000 employees | 5 | 4% | 14 | 14% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| 10,001+ employees | 6 | 4% | 23 | 23% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Self-employed | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IDEXX | share | Thermo Fisher Scientific | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health care | 102 | 76% | 7 | 7% | IDEXX |
| Public, community & associations | 16 | 12% | 13 | 13% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 6 | 4% | 7 | 7% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 4 | 4% | even |
| Business & finance services | 2 | 1% | 12 | 12% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Technology & software | 1 | 1% | 11 | 11% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Manufacturing & industry | – | – | 36 | 36% | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IDEXX | share | Thermo Fisher Scientific | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 109 | 81% | 68 | 68% | IDEXX |
| Australia | 5 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 4 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| France | 4 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 2 | 1% | 9 | 9% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% | 5 | 5% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Norway | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Japan | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IDEXX | share | Thermo Fisher Scientific | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| agriculture and environment | 1,159 | 77% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | 101 | 7% | 5 | 2% | IDEXX |
| Customer service & success | 11 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Administration & office | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 7 | 0% | 21 | 7% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Unclassified | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 5 | 0% | 8 | 3% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Software engineering | 5 | 0% | 11 | 4% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Data & AI | 4 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 3 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 2 | 0% | 64 | 22% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| research and science | 1 | 0% | 66 | 23% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| skilled trades and field service | – | – | 20 | 7% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 17 | 6% | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using IDEXX →
Companies using Thermo Fisher Scientific →
lab informatics instruments ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Thermo Fisher Scientific is named by 100 companies in job postings and IDEXX by 134; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/idexx-vs-thermo-fisher-scientific)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
IDEXX vs Thermo Fisher Scientific: questions
Which is more used, IDEXX or Thermo Fisher Scientific?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, IDEXX (134) over Thermo Fisher Scientific (100). By website-and-DNS footprint, Thermo Fisher Scientific (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses IDEXX?
68% of IDEXX companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 28% for Thermo Fisher Scientific. 16% of IDEXX companies have over 1,000 employees, against 49% for Thermo Fisher Scientific.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually IDEXX in marketing and Thermo Fisher Scientific in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on IDEXX or Thermo Fisher Scientific, and get 1,000 records free.