Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DESAE J1939 VS UART_
As of 30 October 2026, UART is named by 937 companies and SAE J1939 by 152; SAE J1939 skews to companies under 200 people (32% vs 53%), UART to companies over 1,000 (23% vs 45%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: SAE J1939's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, UART rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- SAE J1939: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- UART: 2–200 employees
- 53%
- SAE J1939: 1,000+ employees
- 45%
- UART: 1,000+ employees
- 23%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 2.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | SAE J1939 | share | UART | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 11 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 6 | 4% | 107 | 11% | UART |
| 11-50 employees | 11 | 7% | 175 | 19% | UART |
| 51-200 employees | 32 | 21% | 218 | 23% | UART |
| 201-500 employees | 23 | 15% | 143 | 15% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 10 | 7% | 68 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 25 | 16% | 97 | 10% | SAE J1939 |
| 5001-10000 employees | 9 | 6% | 33 | 4% | SAE J1939 |
| 10,001+ employees | 34 | 22% | 85 | 9% | SAE J1939 |
| Segment | SAE J1939 | share | UART | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 65 | 43% | 443 | 47% | UART |
| Automotive | 27 | 18% | 39 | 4% | SAE J1939 |
| Technology & software | 24 | 16% | 231 | 25% | UART |
| Business & finance services | 12 | 8% | 87 | 9% | even |
| Property & construction | 5 | 3% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 3% | 28 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 29 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 2% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | 17 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | – | – | 14 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | SAE J1939 | share | UART | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 99 | 65% | 579 | 62% | SAE J1939 |
| Germany | 12 | 8% | 53 | 6% | SAE J1939 |
| France | 7 | 5% | 25 | 3% | even |
| Sweden | 6 | 4% | 17 | 2% | SAE J1939 |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% | 47 | 5% | even |
| India | 4 | 3% | 30 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 3 | 2% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 2 | 1% | 23 | 2% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 15 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 10 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | SAE J1939 | share | UART | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 201 | 39% | 1,298 | 34% | SAE J1939 |
| Software engineering | 184 | 36% | 2,020 | 54% | UART |
| skilled trades and field service | 15 | 3% | 7 | 0% | SAE J1939 |
| Product, program & project management | 9 | 2% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 8 | 2% | 29 | 1% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 7 | 1% | 77 | 2% | even |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 3 | 1% | 26 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using SAE J1939 →
Companies using UART →
iot platforms protocols ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
UART is named by 937 companies in job postings and SAE J1939 by 152; 22 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/j1939-vs-uart)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
SAE J1939 vs UART: questions
Which is more used, SAE J1939 or UART?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, UART (937) over SAE J1939 (152). By website-and-DNS footprint, UART (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses SAE J1939?
32% of SAE J1939 companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 53% for UART. 45% of SAE J1939 companies have over 1,000 employees, against 23% for UART.
Do companies run both?
22 companies name both in their postings, usually SAE J1939 in marketing and UART in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on SAE J1939 or UART, and get 1,000 records free.