Java Virtual Machine VS Node.js_
As of 4 November 2026, Node.js is named by 11,693 companies and Java Virtual Machine by 806; Java Virtual Machine skews to companies under 200 people (40% vs 63%), Node.js to companies over 1,000 (15% vs 31%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Java Virtual Machine's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Node.js rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Java Virtual Machine: 2–200 employees
- 40%
- Node.js: 2–200 employees
- 63%
- Java Virtual Machine: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Node.js: 1,000+ employees
- 15%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 2.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Java Virtual Machine | share | Node.js | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 26 | 3% | 707 | 6% | Node.js |
| 2-10 employees | 48 | 6% | 1,882 | 16% | Node.js |
| 11-50 employees | 121 | 15% | 3,116 | 27% | Node.js |
| 51-200 employees | 151 | 19% | 2,376 | 20% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 119 | 15% | 1,176 | 10% | Java Virtual Machine |
| 501-1000 employees | 88 | 11% | 679 | 6% | Java Virtual Machine |
| 1001-5000 employees | 138 | 17% | 883 | 8% | Java Virtual Machine |
| 5001-10000 employees | 34 | 4% | 255 | 2% | Java Virtual Machine |
| 10,001+ employees | 81 | 10% | 619 | 5% | Java Virtual Machine |
| Segment | Java Virtual Machine | share | Node.js | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 453 | 56% | 6,927 | 59% | Node.js |
| Business & finance services | 176 | 22% | 2,233 | 19% | Java Virtual Machine |
| Media & content | 42 | 5% | 426 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 29 | 4% | 274 | 2% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 28 | 3% | 613 | 5% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 17 | 2% | 145 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 16 | 2% | 337 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 12 | 1% | 164 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 8 | 1% | 122 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 8 | 1% | 121 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 6 | 1% | 90 | 1% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 138 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Java Virtual Machine | share | Node.js | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 460 | 57% | 6,204 | 53% | Java Virtual Machine |
| United Kingdom | 70 | 9% | 759 | 6% | Java Virtual Machine |
| Germany | 41 | 5% | 634 | 5% | even |
| India | 21 | 3% | 830 | 7% | Node.js |
| Canada | 13 | 2% | 285 | 2% | even |
| France | 13 | 2% | 317 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 13 | 2% | 162 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 13 | 2% | 118 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 11 | 1% | 175 | 1% | even |
| Singapore | 10 | 1% | 117 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 9 | 1% | 156 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 136 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Java Virtual Machine | share | Node.js | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 1,968 | 76% | 30,903 | 75% | even |
| Data & AI | 155 | 6% | 2,360 | 6% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 116 | 4% | 1,992 | 5% | even |
| Customer service & success | 26 | 1% | 201 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 22 | 1% | 500 | 1% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 9 | 0% | 61 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 9 | 0% | 390 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 8 | 0% | 400 | 1% | even |
| research and science | 3 | 0% | 21 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 3 | 0% | 292 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | 50 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | 44 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | 1 | 0% | 27 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 55 | 0% | even |
| healthcare clinical | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 114 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 69 | 0% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 1 | 0% | 10 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | – | – | 140 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 35 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 19 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 18 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 17 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 13 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| agriculture and environment | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| public safety and protective services | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Java Virtual Machine →
Companies using Node.js →
runtimes platforms ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Node.js is named by 11,693 companies in job postings and Java Virtual Machine by 806; 108 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/jvm-vs-node-js)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Java Virtual Machine vs Node.js: questions
Which is more used, Java Virtual Machine or Node.js?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Node.js (11,693) over Java Virtual Machine (806). By website-and-DNS footprint, Node.js (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Java Virtual Machine?
40% of Java Virtual Machine companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 63% for Node.js. 31% of Java Virtual Machine companies have over 1,000 employees, against 15% for Node.js.
Do companies run both?
108 companies name both in their postings, usually Java Virtual Machine in marketing and Node.js in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Java Virtual Machine or Node.js, and get 1,000 records free.