Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DELangGraph VS Semantic Kernel_
As of 4 November 2026, Semantic Kernel is named by 622 companies and LangGraph by 2,401; LangGraph skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 27%), Semantic Kernel to companies over 1,000 (49% vs 36%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: LangGraph's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Semantic Kernel rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- LangGraph: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- Semantic Kernel: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- LangGraph: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Semantic Kernel: 1,000+ employees
- 49%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.3 · 4.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | LangGraph | share | Semantic Kernel | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 84 | 3% | 8 | 1% | LangGraph |
| 2-10 employees | 214 | 9% | 27 | 4% | LangGraph |
| 11-50 employees | 317 | 13% | 54 | 9% | LangGraph |
| 51-200 employees | 411 | 17% | 88 | 14% | LangGraph |
| 201-500 employees | 285 | 12% | 71 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 228 | 9% | 71 | 11% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 386 | 16% | 118 | 19% | Semantic Kernel |
| 5001-10000 employees | 120 | 5% | 37 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 356 | 15% | 148 | 24% | Semantic Kernel |
| Segment | LangGraph | share | Semantic Kernel | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 1,289 | 54% | 296 | 48% | LangGraph |
| Business & finance services | 556 | 23% | 152 | 24% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 166 | 7% | 69 | 11% | Semantic Kernel |
| Media & content | 78 | 3% | 17 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 55 | 2% | 16 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 50 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 43 | 2% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 41 | 2% | 22 | 4% | even |
| Health care | 31 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 26 | 1% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 25 | 1% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 21 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Segment | LangGraph | share | Semantic Kernel | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,409 | 59% | 390 | 63% | Semantic Kernel |
| United Kingdom | 165 | 7% | 38 | 6% | even |
| Germany | 109 | 5% | 19 | 3% | even |
| India | 79 | 3% | 14 | 2% | even |
| France | 71 | 3% | 23 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 69 | 3% | 21 | 3% | even |
| Spain | 36 | 1% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 31 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 30 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 29 | 1% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 29 | 1% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 28 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Portugal | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Romania | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | LangGraph | share | Semantic Kernel | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 5,714 | 59% | 1,599 | 55% | LangGraph |
| Software engineering | 2,099 | 22% | 764 | 27% | Semantic Kernel |
| IT operations & business systems | 256 | 3% | 110 | 4% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 128 | 1% | 20 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 118 | 1% | 22 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 87 | 1% | 36 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 47 | 0% | 26 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 16 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 14 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | 13 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 12 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 9 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 9 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 8 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 8 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 6 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| research and science | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using LangGraph →
Companies using Semantic Kernel →
llm app frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Semantic Kernel is named by 622 companies in job postings and LangGraph by 2,401; 604 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/langgraph-vs-semantic-kernel)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
LangGraph vs Semantic Kernel: questions
Which is more used, LangGraph or Semantic Kernel?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, LangGraph (2,401) over Semantic Kernel (622). By website-and-DNS footprint, Semantic Kernel (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses LangGraph?
39% of LangGraph companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for Semantic Kernel. 36% of LangGraph companies have over 1,000 employees, against 49% for Semantic Kernel.
Do companies run both?
604 companies name both in their postings, usually LangGraph in marketing and Semantic Kernel in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on LangGraph or Semantic Kernel, and get 1,000 records free.