Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEMagnet AXIOM VS Metasploit_
As of 4 November 2026, Metasploit is named by 370 companies and Magnet AXIOM by 179; Magnet AXIOM skews to companies under 200 people (30% vs 47%), Metasploit to companies over 1,000 (29% vs 52%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Magnet AXIOM's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Metasploit rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Magnet AXIOM: 2–200 employees
- 30%
- Metasploit: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- Magnet AXIOM: 1,000+ employees
- 52%
- Metasploit: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.5 · 1.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Magnet AXIOM | share | Metasploit | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 2% | 13 | 4% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 8 | 4% | 47 | 13% | Metasploit |
| 11-50 employees | 13 | 7% | 74 | 20% | Metasploit |
| 51-200 employees | 33 | 18% | 52 | 14% | Magnet AXIOM |
| 201-500 employees | 14 | 8% | 51 | 14% | Metasploit |
| 501-1000 employees | 14 | 8% | 25 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 43 | 24% | 43 | 12% | Magnet AXIOM |
| 5001-10000 employees | 15 | 8% | 19 | 5% | Magnet AXIOM |
| 10,001+ employees | 35 | 20% | 46 | 12% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Segment | Magnet AXIOM | share | Metasploit | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 55 | 31% | 75 | 20% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Technology & software | 44 | 25% | 203 | 55% | Metasploit |
| Health care | 33 | 18% | 1 | 0% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Manufacturing & industry | 12 | 7% | 18 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 11 | 6% | 29 | 8% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 7 | 4% | 10 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 7 | 4% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 3 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 1% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 1% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Magnet AXIOM | share | Metasploit | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 134 | 75% | 193 | 52% | Magnet AXIOM |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 6% | 22 | 6% | even |
| Canada | 6 | 3% | 5 | 1% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Germany | 5 | 3% | 15 | 4% | even |
| Australia | 4 | 2% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| DZ | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 24 | 6% | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 18 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 6 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Magnet AXIOM | share | Metasploit | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 130 | 17% | 721 | 76% | Metasploit |
| Finance & accounting | 99 | 13% | 4 | 0% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 75 | 10% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 42 | 6% | 9 | 1% | Magnet AXIOM |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 33 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | 26 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 26 | 3% | 4 | 0% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Data & AI | 24 | 3% | 1 | 0% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Software engineering | 24 | 3% | 23 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 22 | 3% | 1 | 0% | Magnet AXIOM |
| Quality, safety & environment | 18 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 15 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 13 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 6 | 1% | 18 | 2% | even |
| General management & consulting | 5 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| healthcare clinical | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| public safety and protective services | 4 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | 2 | 0% | 6 | 1% | even |
| research and science | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 6 | 1% | even |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Magnet AXIOM →
Companies using Metasploit →
offensive security forensics ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Metasploit is named by 370 companies in job postings and Magnet AXIOM by 179; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/magnet-axiom-vs-metasploit)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Magnet AXIOM vs Metasploit: questions
Which is more used, Magnet AXIOM or Metasploit?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Metasploit (370) over Magnet AXIOM (179). By website-and-DNS footprint, Metasploit (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Magnet AXIOM?
30% of Magnet AXIOM companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 47% for Metasploit. 52% of Magnet AXIOM companies have over 1,000 employees, against 29% for Metasploit.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Magnet AXIOM in marketing and Metasploit in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Magnet AXIOM or Metasploit, and get 1,000 records free.