Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEMicrosoft Access VS SQLite_
As of 30 October 2026, SQLite is named by 373 companies and Microsoft Access by 987; Microsoft Access skews to companies under 200 people (26% vs 62%), SQLite to companies over 1,000 (20% vs 53%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Access's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SQLite rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Access: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- SQLite: 2–200 employees
- 62%
- Microsoft Access: 1,000+ employees
- 53%
- SQLite: 1,000+ employees
- 20%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 2.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | SQLite | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 5 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 30 | 3% | 43 | 12% | SQLite |
| 11-50 employees | 92 | 9% | 108 | 29% | SQLite |
| 51-200 employees | 133 | 13% | 80 | 21% | SQLite |
| 201-500 employees | 118 | 12% | 42 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 90 | 9% | 19 | 5% | Microsoft Access |
| 1001-5000 employees | 194 | 20% | 37 | 10% | Microsoft Access |
| 5001-10000 employees | 84 | 9% | 7 | 2% | Microsoft Access |
| 10,001+ employees | 241 | 24% | 30 | 8% | Microsoft Access |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | SQLite | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 249 | 25% | 45 | 12% | Microsoft Access |
| Manufacturing & industry | 187 | 19% | 44 | 12% | Microsoft Access |
| Technology & software | 165 | 17% | 231 | 62% | SQLite |
| Health care | 85 | 9% | 1 | 0% | Microsoft Access |
| Public, community & associations | 51 | 5% | 10 | 3% | Microsoft Access |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 50 | 5% | 4 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| Commerce & trade | 48 | 5% | 6 | 2% | Microsoft Access |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 33 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 31 | 3% | 4 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| Consumer services & leisure | 28 | 3% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 28 | 3% | 11 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 23 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | SQLite | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 753 | 76% | 170 | 46% | Microsoft Access |
| United Kingdom | 47 | 5% | 19 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 44 | 4% | 11 | 3% | even |
| Germany | 32 | 3% | 18 | 5% | even |
| Australia | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 12 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 8 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 6 | 1% | 58 | 16% | SQLite |
| Italy | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| VN | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | SQLite | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 700 | 18% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 290 | 8% | 42 | 3% | Microsoft Access |
| Data & AI | 281 | 7% | 52 | 4% | Microsoft Access |
| IT operations & business systems | 262 | 7% | 65 | 5% | Microsoft Access |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 175 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 167 | 4% | 12 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| Administration & office | 146 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 139 | 4% | 1,055 | 74% | SQLite |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 129 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 106 | 3% | 13 | 1% | even |
| procurement and purchasing | 66 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 65 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 12 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Access →
Companies using SQLite →
relational databases ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SQLite is named by 373 companies in job postings and Microsoft Access by 987; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-access-vs-sqlite)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Access vs SQLite: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Access or SQLite?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Access (987) over SQLite (373). By website-and-DNS footprint, SQLite (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Access?
26% of Microsoft Access companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 62% for SQLite. 53% of Microsoft Access companies have over 1,000 employees, against 20% for SQLite.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Access in marketing and SQLite in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Access or SQLite, and get 1,000 records free.