Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEMicrosoft Fabric VS Microsoft OneLake_
As of 4 November 2026, Microsoft OneLake is named by 306 companies and Microsoft Fabric by 2,716; Microsoft Fabric skews to companies under 200 people (27% vs 23%), Microsoft OneLake to companies over 1,000 (47% vs 43%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Fabric's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft OneLake rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Fabric: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- Microsoft OneLake: 2–200 employees
- 23%
- Microsoft Fabric: 1,000+ employees
- 43%
- Microsoft OneLake: 1,000+ employees
- 47%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.6 · 2.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Fabric | share | Microsoft OneLake | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 41 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 121 | 4% | 13 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 217 | 8% | 13 | 4% | Microsoft Fabric |
| 51-200 employees | 402 | 15% | 45 | 15% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 408 | 15% | 44 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 355 | 13% | 45 | 15% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 587 | 22% | 82 | 27% | Microsoft OneLake |
| 5001-10000 employees | 174 | 6% | 16 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 411 | 15% | 46 | 15% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft Fabric | share | Microsoft OneLake | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 810 | 30% | 105 | 34% | Microsoft OneLake |
| Business & finance services | 622 | 23% | 67 | 22% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 383 | 14% | 41 | 13% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 144 | 5% | 11 | 4% | even |
| Property & construction | 124 | 5% | 13 | 4% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 119 | 4% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 91 | 3% | 10 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 90 | 3% | 12 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 89 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 73 | 3% | 13 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 66 | 2% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 57 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft Fabric | share | Microsoft OneLake | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,367 | 50% | 180 | 59% | Microsoft OneLake |
| United Kingdom | 227 | 8% | 26 | 8% | even |
| Germany | 170 | 6% | 10 | 3% | Microsoft Fabric |
| Canada | 124 | 5% | 15 | 5% | even |
| France | 80 | 3% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 68 | 3% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 53 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 47 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| India | 39 | 1% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Belgium | 38 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 37 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 37 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Fabric | share | Microsoft OneLake | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 4,710 | 54% | 521 | 73% | Microsoft OneLake |
| IT operations & business systems | 929 | 11% | 38 | 5% | Microsoft Fabric |
| Software engineering | 882 | 10% | 34 | 5% | Microsoft Fabric |
| Sales | 224 | 3% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 182 | 2% | 19 | 3% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 118 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 117 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 108 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 30 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 25 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 23 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 22 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | 18 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 15 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 15 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | 12 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 12 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 12 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 12 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 11 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 11 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | 6 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| public safety and protective services | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| research and science | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| social care and community | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Travel, leisure & events | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Fabric →
Companies using Microsoft OneLake →
lakehouse table formats ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft OneLake is named by 306 companies in job postings and Microsoft Fabric by 2,716; 429 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-fabric-vs-onelake)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Fabric vs Microsoft OneLake: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Fabric or Microsoft OneLake?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Fabric (2,716) over Microsoft OneLake (306). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft OneLake (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Fabric?
27% of Microsoft Fabric companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 23% for Microsoft OneLake. 43% of Microsoft Fabric companies have over 1,000 employees, against 47% for Microsoft OneLake.
Do companies run both?
429 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Fabric in marketing and Microsoft OneLake in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Fabric or Microsoft OneLake, and get 1,000 records free.