Compare · api specs data formats

Model Context Protocol VS ANSI X12_

As of 30 October 2026, ANSI X12 is named by 283 companies and Model Context Protocol by 3,710; Model Context Protocol skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 32%), ANSI X12 to companies over 1,000 (42% vs 31%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Model Context Protocol's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, ANSI X12 rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Model Context Protocol: 2–200 employees
42%
ANSI X12: 2–200 employees
32%
Model Context Protocol: 1,000+ employees
31%
ANSI X12: 1,000+ employees
42%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.2 · 2.0
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
3,710companies name Model Context Protocol
283companies name ANSI X12
0name both
11,870 · 573postings in 90 days, Model Context Protocol · ANSI X12
02 — Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentModel Context ProtocolshareANSI X12shareLeans
Self-employed642%52%even
2-10 employees2527%155%even
11-50 employees49013%269%Model Context Protocol
51-200 employees80022%5018%Model Context Protocol
201-500 employees54815%4114%even
501-1000 employees40811%2710%even
1001-5000 employees61216%5921%ANSI X12
5001-10000 employees1604%155%even
10,001+ employees37610%4516%ANSI X12
By industry
SegmentModel Context ProtocolshareANSI X12shareLeans
Technology & software1,93152%11139%Model Context Protocol
Business & finance services78121%4315%Model Context Protocol
Manufacturing & industry2767%3713%ANSI X12
Media & content1454%52%Model Context Protocol
Commerce & trade993%83%even
Consumer services & leisure852%21%even
Utilities & infrastructure852%10%even
Public, community & associations822%41%even
Health care672%4014%ANSI X12
Transport, logistics & rental501%2710%ANSI X12
Property & construction481%10%even
Automotive301%41%even
By country
SegmentModel Context ProtocolshareANSI X12shareLeans
United States2,39164%24185%ANSI X12
United Kingdom2858%41%Model Context Protocol
Germany2126%83%Model Context Protocol
Canada1063%104%even
France1033%––outside top 12
India521%31%even
Netherlands521%31%even
Sweden421%––outside top 12
Australia411%10%even
Spain331%21%even
Brazil321%10%even
Poland321%––outside top 12
Austria––10%outside top 12
Colombia––10%outside top 12
Czechia––10%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentModel Context ProtocolshareANSI X12shareLeans
Data & AI4,80533%7810%Model Context Protocol
Software engineering4,10128%26935%ANSI X12
IT operations & business systems1,44010%15420%ANSI X12
Product, program & project management6595%476%even
Sales4613%101%even
Engineering (non-software)2051%81%even
Marketing & communications1711%––outside top 12
Customer service & success1461%71%even
Design & UX1091%––outside top 12
General management & consulting761%51%even
Finance & accounting630%41%even
Business development & strategy620%20%even
Quality, safety & environment––20%outside top 12
Administration & office––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

ANSI X12 is named by 283 companies in job postings and Model Context Protocol by 3,710; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/model-context-protocol-vs-x12)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Model Context Protocol vs ANSI X12: questions

Which is more used, Model Context Protocol or ANSI X12?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Model Context Protocol (3,710) over ANSI X12 (283). By website-and-DNS footprint, ANSI X12 (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Model Context Protocol?

42% of Model Context Protocol companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 32% for ANSI X12. 31% of Model Context Protocol companies have over 1,000 employees, against 42% for ANSI X12.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Model Context Protocol in marketing and ANSI X12 in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Model Context Protocol or ANSI X12, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free