PACER VS Thomson Reuters_
As of 4 November 2026, Thomson Reuters is named by 147 companies and PACER by 178; PACER skews to companies under 200 people (26% vs 38%), Thomson Reuters to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 44%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: PACER's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Thomson Reuters rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- PACER: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- Thomson Reuters: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- PACER: 1,000+ employees
- 44%
- Thomson Reuters: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.9 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 273
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | PACER | share | Thomson Reuters | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 9 | 5% | 7 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 15 | 8% | 21 | 14% | Thomson Reuters |
| 51-200 employees | 23 | 13% | 28 | 19% | Thomson Reuters |
| 201-500 employees | 25 | 14% | 21 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 25 | 14% | 17 | 12% | PACER |
| 1001-5000 employees | 51 | 29% | 21 | 14% | PACER |
| 5001-10000 employees | 9 | 5% | 9 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 18 | 10% | 23 | 16% | Thomson Reuters |
| Segment | PACER | share | Thomson Reuters | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 130 | 73% | 89 | 61% | PACER |
| Public, community & associations | 16 | 9% | 4 | 3% | PACER |
| Technology & software | 8 | 4% | 20 | 14% | Thomson Reuters |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 5 | 3% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 4 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 3 | 2% | 8 | 5% | Thomson Reuters |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | 4 | 3% | Thomson Reuters |
| Automotive | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | PACER | share | Thomson Reuters | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 156 | 88% | 111 | 76% | PACER |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 5% | 10 | 7% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Germany | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| France | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | – | – | 7 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| New Zealand | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Portugal | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | PACER | share | Thomson Reuters | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal, compliance & risk | 634 | 78% | 47 | 8% | PACER |
| Administration & office | 30 | 4% | 7 | 1% | PACER |
| Finance & accounting | 11 | 1% | 241 | 39% | Thomson Reuters |
| healthcare clinical | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | 6 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 3 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Software engineering | 3 | 0% | 23 | 4% | Thomson Reuters |
| IT operations & business systems | 2 | 0% | 40 | 7% | Thomson Reuters |
| research and science | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | 38 | 6% | Thomson Reuters |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1 | 0% | 12 | 2% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | 15 | 2% | Thomson Reuters |
| procurement and purchasing | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 17 | 3% | Thomson Reuters |
| Sales | 1 | 0% | 36 | 6% | Thomson Reuters |
| Travel, leisure & events | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 14 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 11 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| real estate and property | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using PACER →
Companies using Thomson Reuters →
legal research ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Thomson Reuters is named by 147 companies in job postings and PACER by 178; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/pacer-vs-thomson-reuters)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
PACER vs Thomson Reuters: questions
Which is more used, PACER or Thomson Reuters?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, PACER (178) over Thomson Reuters (147). By website-and-DNS footprint, Thomson Reuters (273 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses PACER?
26% of PACER companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Thomson Reuters. 44% of PACER companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Thomson Reuters.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually PACER in marketing and Thomson Reuters in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on PACER or Thomson Reuters, and get 1,000 records free.