Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DESparx Enterprise Architect VS UML_
As of 4 November 2026, UML is named by 818 companies and Sparx Enterprise Architect by 526; Sparx Enterprise Architect skews to companies under 200 people (40% vs 44%), UML to companies over 1,000 (32% vs 36%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Sparx Enterprise Architect's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, UML rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Sparx Enterprise Architect: 2–200 employees
- 40%
- UML: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- Sparx Enterprise Architect: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- UML: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.0 · 4.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | UML | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 16 | 3% | 19 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 38 | 7% | 63 | 8% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 60 | 11% | 139 | 17% | UML |
| 51-200 employees | 110 | 21% | 157 | 19% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 57 | 11% | 105 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 57 | 11% | 71 | 9% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| 1001-5000 employees | 92 | 17% | 117 | 14% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| 5001-10000 employees | 23 | 4% | 30 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 73 | 14% | 117 | 14% | even |
| Segment | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | UML | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 217 | 41% | 373 | 46% | UML |
| Business & finance services | 107 | 20% | 173 | 21% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 102 | 19% | 136 | 17% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Automotive | 20 | 4% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 19 | 4% | 23 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 15 | 3% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 15 | 3% | 17 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 11 | 2% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 5 | 1% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 5 | 1% | 14 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 4 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 4 | 1% | 13 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | UML | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 222 | 42% | 310 | 38% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Germany | 53 | 10% | 96 | 12% | even |
| United Kingdom | 43 | 8% | 45 | 6% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Poland | 38 | 7% | 28 | 3% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| France | 19 | 4% | 64 | 8% | UML |
| Czechia | 17 | 3% | 14 | 2% | even |
| Belgium | 15 | 3% | 19 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 15 | 3% | 21 | 3% | even |
| Spain | 11 | 2% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 9 | 2% | 27 | 3% | even |
| Sweden | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 8 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 16 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 12 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | UML | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 1,046 | 49% | 765 | 17% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Engineering (non-software) | 336 | 16% | 354 | 8% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Software engineering | 290 | 14% | 2,885 | 63% | UML |
| Data & AI | 108 | 5% | 103 | 2% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Product, program & project management | 23 | 1% | 33 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 20 | 1% | 10 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 14 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 11 | 1% | 16 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 9 | 0% | 11 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 6 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | 2 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Sparx Enterprise Architect →
Companies using UML →
requirements mbse ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
UML is named by 818 companies in job postings and Sparx Enterprise Architect by 526; 164 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/sparx-enterprise-architect-vs-uml)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Sparx Enterprise Architect vs UML: questions
Which is more used, Sparx Enterprise Architect or UML?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, UML (818) over Sparx Enterprise Architect (526). By website-and-DNS footprint, UML (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Sparx Enterprise Architect?
40% of Sparx Enterprise Architect companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 44% for UML. 36% of Sparx Enterprise Architect companies have over 1,000 employees, against 32% for UML.
Do companies run both?
164 companies name both in their postings, usually Sparx Enterprise Architect in marketing and UML in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Sparx Enterprise Architect or UML, and get 1,000 records free.