Thermo Fisher Scientific VS Waters Empower_
As of 4 November 2026, Waters Empower is named by 258 companies and Thermo Fisher Scientific by 100; Thermo Fisher Scientific skews to companies under 200 people (28% vs 28%), Waters Empower to companies over 1,000 (47% vs 49%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Thermo Fisher Scientific's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Waters Empower rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Thermo Fisher Scientific: 2–200 employees
- 28%
- Waters Empower: 2–200 employees
- 28%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific: 1,000+ employees
- 49%
- Waters Empower: 1,000+ employees
- 47%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 2.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Thermo Fisher Scientific | share | Waters Empower | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 4 | 4% | 12 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 7 | 7% | 16 | 6% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 17 | 17% | 44 | 17% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 10 | 10% | 32 | 12% | Waters Empower |
| 501-1000 employees | 12 | 12% | 33 | 13% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 12 | 12% | 51 | 20% | Waters Empower |
| 5001-10000 employees | 14 | 14% | 18 | 7% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| 10,001+ employees | 23 | 23% | 51 | 20% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Segment | Thermo Fisher Scientific | share | Waters Empower | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 36 | 36% | 130 | 50% | Waters Empower |
| Public, community & associations | 13 | 13% | 17 | 7% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Business & finance services | 12 | 12% | 46 | 18% | Waters Empower |
| Technology & software | 11 | 11% | 26 | 10% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 7 | 7% | 5 | 2% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Health care | 7 | 7% | 12 | 5% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Media & content | 4 | 4% | 3 | 1% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 3% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 7 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Thermo Fisher Scientific | share | Waters Empower | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 68 | 68% | 167 | 65% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Germany | 9 | 9% | 11 | 4% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% | 11 | 4% | even |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| France | 2 | 2% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Finland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 1 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Japan | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 8 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Thermo Fisher Scientific | share | Waters Empower | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| research and science | 66 | 23% | 207 | 21% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Engineering (non-software) | 64 | 22% | 27 | 3% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Sales | 21 | 7% | 44 | 4% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| skilled trades and field service | 20 | 7% | 4 | 0% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Quality, safety & environment | 17 | 6% | 139 | 14% | Waters Empower |
| Software engineering | 11 | 4% | 25 | 2% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 8 | 3% | 35 | 3% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 7 | 2% | 2 | 0% | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| healthcare clinical | 5 | 2% | 119 | 12% | Waters Empower |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 4 | 1% | 11 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 2 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 1% | 39 | 4% | Waters Empower |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 53 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | – | – | 23 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 12 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 10 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| healthcare support and caregiving | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| social care and community | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| agriculture and environment | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Travel, leisure & events | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| public safety and protective services | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Thermo Fisher Scientific →
Companies using Waters Empower →
lab informatics instruments ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Waters Empower is named by 258 companies in job postings and Thermo Fisher Scientific by 100; 11 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/thermo-fisher-scientific-vs-waters-empower)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Thermo Fisher Scientific vs Waters Empower: questions
Which is more used, Thermo Fisher Scientific or Waters Empower?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Waters Empower (258) over Thermo Fisher Scientific (100). By website-and-DNS footprint, Waters Empower (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Thermo Fisher Scientific?
28% of Thermo Fisher Scientific companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 28% for Waters Empower. 49% of Thermo Fisher Scientific companies have over 1,000 employees, against 47% for Waters Empower.
Do companies run both?
11 companies name both in their postings, usually Thermo Fisher Scientific in marketing and Waters Empower in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Thermo Fisher Scientific or Waters Empower, and get 1,000 records free.