Compare · query languages

Transact-SQL VS XPath_

As of 30 October 2026, XPath is named by 165 companies and Transact-SQL by 1,259; Transact-SQL skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 44%), XPath to companies over 1,000 (32% vs 35%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Transact-SQL's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, XPath rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Transact-SQL: 2–200 employees
39%
XPath: 2–200 employees
44%
Transact-SQL: 1,000+ employees
35%
XPath: 1,000+ employees
32%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.3 · 2.1
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
1,259companies name Transact-SQL
165companies name XPath
0name both
2,855 · 341postings in 90 days, Transact-SQL · XPath
02 — Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentTransact-SQLshareXPathshareLeans
Self-employed81%21%even
2-10 employees514%95%even
11-50 employees18214%2113%even
51-200 employees25520%4225%XPath
201-500 employees19916%2616%even
501-1000 employees12910%138%Transact-SQL
1001-5000 employees23919%2616%Transact-SQL
5001-10000 employees675%85%even
10,001+ employees12910%1811%even
By industry
SegmentTransact-SQLshareXPathshareLeans
Technology & software58446%11167%XPath
Business & finance services29624%2918%Transact-SQL
Manufacturing & industry12410%138%even
Health care383%21%even
Utilities & infrastructure373%21%even
Commerce & trade302%11%even
Public, community & associations272%––outside top 12
Property & construction252%11%even
Media & content242%––outside top 12
Transport, logistics & rental242%21%even
Consumer services & leisure232%21%even
Automotive141%11%even
Hospitality & travel––11%outside top 12
By country
SegmentTransact-SQLshareXPathshareLeans
United States77061%9960%even
United Kingdom907%138%even
Germany524%42%even
Canada443%42%even
India383%95%XPath
Australia302%32%even
Poland302%32%even
Italy222%––outside top 12
Netherlands192%21%even
France181%74%XPath
Spain141%––outside top 12
Sweden121%––outside top 12
Switzerland––21%outside top 12
Portugal––21%outside top 12
Romania––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentTransact-SQLshareXPathshareLeans
Software engineering1,69737%32951%XPath
Data & AI1,00122%274%Transact-SQL
IT operations & business systems1,00122%9515%Transact-SQL
Engineering (non-software)571%406%XPath
Product, program & project management471%152%even
Customer service & success331%30%even
Unclassified231%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting200%20%even
Marketing & communications130%71%even
Sales120%51%even
Education & training90%––outside top 12
Administration & office70%––outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––71%outside top 12
research and science––30%outside top 12
logistics warehouse and transport––20%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

XPath is named by 165 companies in job postings and Transact-SQL by 1,259; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/transact-sql-vs-xpath)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Transact-SQL vs XPath: questions

Which is more used, Transact-SQL or XPath?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Transact-SQL (1,259) over XPath (165). By website-and-DNS footprint, XPath (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Transact-SQL?

39% of Transact-SQL companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 44% for XPath. 35% of Transact-SQL companies have over 1,000 employees, against 32% for XPath.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Transact-SQL in marketing and XPath in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Transact-SQL or XPath, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free