Tools · Category

privacy consent, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, OneTrust leads privacy consent with 291 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Google Consent Mode at 21.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
OneTrust · 291
Runner-up
Google Consent Mode · 21
Most hiring, 90 days
OneTrust
Highest postings per company
IAB Global Privacy Platform
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
341companies across the category
85%of them on OneTrust
743postings naming a privacy consent in 90 days
4tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every privacy consent we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
OneTrustOneTrust
291
6262.2
2
Google Consent ModeGoogle
21
231.1
3
IAB Global Privacy PlatformIAB Tech Lab
19
723.8
4
DidomiDidomi
10
222.2
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

OneTrust leads privacy consent with 291 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Google Consent Mode at 21. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/privacy-consent)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

privacy consent: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free