FIDO2 alternatives_
As of 4 November 2026, 39 identity are named by companies instead of FIDO2: Active Directory by 8,045 companies, Microsoft Entra ID by 6,276, OAuth by 4,173.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- FIDO2, companies in postings
- 198
- Most used alternative
- Active Directory · 8,045
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Active Directory
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
Identity companies choose instead of FIDO2
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs FIDO2 | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active DirectoryMicrosoft | 8,045 | 4063% | 20,501 | FIDO2 vs Active Directory → | |
| 2 | Microsoft Entra IDMicrosoft | 6,276 | 3170% | 16,203 | FIDO2 vs Microsoft Entra ID → | |
| 3 | OAuthIETF | 4,173 | 2108% | 10,994 | FIDO2 vs OAuth → | |
| 4 | OpenID ConnectOpenID Foundation | 2,634 | 1330% | 6,510 | FIDO2 vs OpenID Connect → | |
| 5 | SAMLOASIS | 2,309 | 1166% | 5,573 | FIDO2 vs SAML → | |
| 6 | JSON Web TokenIETF | 1,752 | 885% | 3,904 | FIDO2 vs JSON Web Token → | |
| 7 | OktaOkta | 1,656 | 836% | 4,378 | FIDO2 vs Okta → | |
| 8 | LDAPIETF | 1,398 | 706% | 3,859 | FIDO2 vs LDAP → | |
| 9 | SCIMIETF | 844 | 426% | 1,707 | FIDO2 vs SCIM → | |
| 10 | KeycloakRed Hat | 558 | 282% | 1,144 | FIDO2 vs Keycloak → | |
| 11 | KerberosMIT | 451 | 228% | 905 | FIDO2 vs Kerberos → | |
| 12 | RADIUSIETF | 379 | 191% | 935 | FIDO2 vs RADIUS → | |
| 13 | Auth0Okta | 347 | 175% | 653 | FIDO2 vs Auth0 → | |
| 14 | AWS IAMAmazon Web Services | 342 | 173% | 815 | FIDO2 vs AWS IAM → | |
| 15 | Ping IdentityPing Identity | 281 | 142% | 974 | FIDO2 vs Ping Identity → | |
| 16 | Amazon CognitoAmazon Web Services | 278 | 140% | 500 | FIDO2 vs Amazon Cognito → | |
| 17 | Active Directory Federation ServicesMicrosoft | 246 | 124% | 595 | FIDO2 vs Active Directory Federation Services → | |
| 18 | 239 | 121% | 646 | FIDO2 vs SAP Identity Authentication Service → | ||
| 19 | Microsoft Entra ConnectMicrosoft | 217 | 110% | 452 | FIDO2 vs Microsoft Entra Connect → | |
| 20 | RSA SecurIDRSA Security | 204 | 103% | 464 | FIDO2 vs RSA SecurID → | |
| 21 | TACACS+Cisco | 189 | 95% | 404 | FIDO2 vs TACACS+ → | |
| 22 | AWS OrganizationsAmazon | 172 | 87% | 299 | FIDO2 vs AWS Organizations → | |
| 23 | Cisco DuoCisco | 156 | 79% | 307 | FIDO2 vs Cisco Duo → | |
| 24 | Azure Managed IdentityMicrosoft | 154 | 78% | 323 | FIDO2 vs Azure Managed Identity → | |
| 25 | JumpCloudJumpCloud | 152 | 77% | 230 | FIDO2 vs JumpCloud → | |
| 26 | PasskeysFIDO Alliance | 138 | 70% | 242 | soon | |
| 27 | WebAuthnW3C | 114 | 58% | 240 | soon | |
| 28 | ForgeRockPing Identity | 108 | 55% | 342 | soon | |
| 29 | Google Cloud IdentityGoogle | 93 | 47% | 263 | soon | |
| 30 | SPIFFECNCF | 79 | 40% | 202 | soon | |
| 31 | PingFederatePing Identity | 63 | 32% | 193 | soon | |
| 32 | OpenStack KeystoneOpenInfra Foundation | 56 | 28% | 113 | soon | |
| 33 | Azure AD B2CMicrosoft | 52 | 26% | 123 | soon | |
| 34 | CA SiteMinderBroadcom | 51 | 26% | 115 | soon | |
| 35 | FreeIPARed Hat | 49 | 25% | 91 | soon | |
| 36 | OneLoginOne Identity | 41 | 21% | 48 | soon | |
| 37 | IdentityServerDuende Software | 40 | 20% | 71 | soon | |
| 38 | Microsoft AuthenticatorMicrosoft | 40 | 20% | 157 | soon | |
| 39 | OpenLDAPOpenLDAP Foundation | 40 | 20% | 99 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on FIDO2 users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Free plan: 1,000 records, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 identity are named by companies instead of FIDO2: Active Directory by 8,045 companies, Microsoft Entra ID by 6,276, OAuth by 4,173, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/fido2/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FIDO2 alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to FIDO2?
Active Directory: 8,045 companies name it in their own job postings, against 198 for FIDO2.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on FIDO2
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool, and get 1,000 records free.