Start free
Tools · build packaging · Alternatives

GNU Make alternatives_

As of 4 November 2026, 39 build packaging are named by companies instead of GNU Make: Apache Maven by 2,043 companies, Gradle by 1,259, Webpack by 1,059.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

GNU Make, companies in postings
150
Most used alternative
Apache Maven · 2,043
Fastest hiring, 90 days
Apache Maven
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01 — Ranked by evidence

build packaging companies choose instead of GNU Make

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs GNU Makepostings, 90 dCompare
1
Apache MavenApache Software Foundation
2,0431362%6,823GNU Make vs Apache Maven →
2
GradleGradle
1,259839%3,124GNU Make vs Gradle →
3
WebpackOpenJS Foundation
1,059706%2,011GNU Make vs Webpack →
4
ViteEvan You / Vite team
798532%1,188GNU Make vs Vite →
5
JFrog ArtifactoryJFrog
750500%2,422GNU Make vs JFrog Artifactory →
6
CMakeKitware
592395%1,386GNU Make vs CMake →
7
npmGitHub
578385%1,065GNU Make vs npm →
8
ComposerComposer (PHP)
493329%860GNU Make vs Composer →
9
GCCGNU Project
440293%1,321GNU Make vs GCC →
10
Apache AntApache Software Foundation
349233%521GNU Make vs Apache Ant →
11
Swift Package ManagerApple
297198%828GNU Make vs Swift Package Manager →
12
BabelBabel
261174%428GNU Make vs Babel →
13
BazelGoogle
258172%634GNU Make vs Bazel →
14
GulpGulp
256171%262GNU Make vs Gulp →
15
YarnYarn
226151%527GNU Make vs Yarn →
16
GruntOpenJS Foundation
185123%199GNU Make vs Grunt →
17
RPMRed Hat
156104%295GNU Make vs RPM →
18
JFrogJFrog
153102%600GNU Make vs JFrog →
19
TurborepoVercel
14395%243GNU Make vs Turborepo →
20
pnpmpnpm
14194%198soon
21
LLVMLLVM Foundation
13892%577soon
22
NuGetMicrosoft
11778%200soon
23
Salesforce CLISalesforce
10771%215soon
24
HarborCNCF
10469%268soon
25
CocoaPodsCocoaPods
10369%138soon
26
MLIRLLVM Project
9966%498soon
27
Module FederationWebpack
9765%264soon
28
ClangLLVM Project
9362%194soon
29
ConanJFrog
8758%189soon
30
RollupRollup contributors
7047%81soon
31
BuckMeta
6946%147soon
32
Google Artifact RegistryGoogle
6644%139soon
33
Angular CLIGoogle
6543%139soon
34
PyPIPython Software Foundation
6543%266soon
35
pipPython Software Foundation
6443%179soon
36
APTDebian
6141%141soon
37
Ninja
6040%116soon
38
BitBakeYocto Project
5839%101soon
39
MSBuildMicrosoft
5637%95soon
12,166 companies name a build packaging in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on GNU Make users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Get the full list Watch this category

Free plan: 1,000 records, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 build packaging are named by companies instead of GNU Make: Apache Maven by 2,043 companies, Gradle by 1,259, Webpack by 1,059, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/gnu-make/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

GNU Make alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to GNU Make?

Apache Maven: 2,043 companies name it in their own job postings, against 150 for GNU Make.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on GNU Make
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool, and get 1,000 records free.

Start free with 1,000 records
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free