Mercurial alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 18 version control code hosting are named by companies instead of Mercurial: Git by 17,317 companies, GitHub by 7,451, Azure DevOps by 6,393.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Mercurial, companies in postings
- 203
- Most used alternative
- Git · 17,317
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Git
- Alternatives ranked
- 18
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
version control code hosting companies choose instead of Mercurial
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Mercurial | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GitLinux Foundation | 17,317 | 8531% | 70,684 | Mercurial vs Git → | |
| 2 | GitHubMicrosoft | 7,451 | 3670% | 23,615 | Mercurial vs GitHub → | |
| 3 | Azure DevOpsMicrosoft | 6,393 | 3149% | 25,214 | Mercurial vs Azure DevOps → | |
| 4 | GitLabGitLab | 3,765 | 1855% | 15,050 | Mercurial vs GitLab → | |
| 5 | BitbucketAtlassian | 1,720 | 847% | 6,253 | Mercurial vs Bitbucket → | |
| 6 | Apache SubversionApache Software Foundation | 1,454 | 716% | 2,957 | Mercurial vs Apache Subversion → | |
| 7 | Perforce Helix CorePerforce | 287 | 141% | 1,093 | Mercurial vs Perforce Helix Core → | |
| 8 | GitHub EnterpriseGitHub | 269 | 133% | 732 | Mercurial vs GitHub Enterprise → | |
| 9 | CVSGNU | 194 | 96% | 429 | Mercurial vs CVS → | |
| 10 | RCSGNU Project | 133 | 66% | 313 | soon | |
| 11 | GerritGerrit Code Review | 129 | 64% | 486 | soon | |
| 12 | 127 | 63% | 452 | soon | ||
| 13 | PVCSSerena | 32 | 16% | 46 | soon | |
| 14 | AWS CodeCommitAmazon | 31 | 15% | 74 | soon | |
| 15 | Atlassian CrucibleAtlassian | 30 | 15% | 273 | soon | |
| 16 | GiteaGitea | 22 | 11% | 43 | soon | |
| 17 | AldonRocket Software | 17 | 8% | 22 | soon | |
| 18 | FishEyeAtlassian | 17 | 8% | 42 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Mercurial users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
18 version control code hosting are named by companies instead of Mercurial: Git by 17,317 companies, GitHub by 7,451, Azure DevOps by 6,393, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/mercurial/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Mercurial alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Mercurial?
Git: 17,317 companies name it in their own job postings, against 203 for Mercurial.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Mercurial
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.