Okuma alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 plc programming are named by companies instead of Okuma: Allen-Bradley by 2,072 companies, Rockwell Automation by 1,255, Siemens TIA Portal by 1,151.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Okuma, companies in postings
- 257
- Most used alternative
- Allen-Bradley · 2,072
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Allen-Bradley
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
plc programming companies choose instead of Okuma
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Okuma | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allen-BradleyRockwell Automation | 2,072 | 806% | 5,489 | Okuma vs Allen-Bradley → | |
| 2 | Rockwell AutomationRockwell Automation | 1,255 | 488% | 3,383 | Okuma vs Rockwell Automation → | |
| 3 | Siemens TIA PortalSiemens | 1,151 | 448% | 2,685 | Okuma vs Siemens TIA Portal → | |
| 4 | Siemens SIMATIC S7Siemens | 1,112 | 433% | 2,601 | Okuma vs Siemens SIMATIC S7 → | |
| 5 | HeidenhainDr. Johannes Heidenhain GmbH | 625 | 243% | 2,194 | Okuma vs Heidenhain → | |
| 6 | Studio 5000Rockwell Automation | 530 | 206% | 1,175 | Okuma vs Studio 5000 → | |
| 7 | BeckhoffBeckhoff Automation | 479 | 186% | 864 | Okuma vs Beckhoff → | |
| 8 | MazakYamazaki Mazak | 452 | 176% | 1,233 | Okuma vs Mazak → | |
| 9 | Siemens STEP 7Siemens | 448 | 174% | 904 | Okuma vs Siemens STEP 7 → | |
| 10 | ControlLogixRockwell Automation | 432 | 168% | 920 | Okuma vs ControlLogix → | |
| 11 | OmronOmron | 358 | 139% | 716 | Okuma vs Omron → | |
| 12 | Ladder LogicIEC | 349 | 136% | 726 | Okuma vs Ladder Logic → | |
| 13 | CODESYSCODESYS Group | 306 | 119% | 544 | Okuma vs CODESYS → | |
| 14 | IEC 61131IEC | 298 | 116% | 495 | Okuma vs IEC 61131 → | |
| 15 | RSLogixRockwell Automation | 257 | 100% | 470 | Okuma vs RSLogix → | |
| 16 | TwinCATBeckhoff Automation | 255 | 99% | 466 | Okuma vs TwinCAT → | |
| 17 | 252 | 98% | 481 | Okuma vs Structured Text → | ||
| 18 | CompactLogixRockwell Automation | 198 | 77% | 352 | Okuma vs CompactLogix → | |
| 19 | Siemens SINUMERIK 840DSiemens | 174 | 68% | 376 | Okuma vs Siemens SINUMERIK 840D → | |
| 20 | ModiconSchneider Electric | 165 | 64% | 347 | Okuma vs Modicon → | |
| 21 | Rockwell LogixRockwell Automation | 156 | 61% | 305 | Okuma vs Rockwell Logix → | |
| 22 | SINUMERIKSiemens | 149 | 58% | 457 | Okuma vs SINUMERIK → | |
| 23 | B&R AutomationB&R Industrial Automation (ABB) | 140 | 54% | 235 | Okuma vs B&R Automation → | |
| 24 | SIMATIC S5Siemens | 132 | 51% | 243 | Okuma vs SIMATIC S5 → | |
| 25 | 127 | 49% | 226 | Okuma vs Function Block Diagram → | ||
| 26 | SCLSiemens | 102 | 40% | 182 | soon | |
| 27 | WAGOWAGO | 92 | 36% | 148 | soon | |
| 28 | RSLogix 500Rockwell Automation | 91 | 35% | 146 | soon | |
| 29 | Allen-Bradley PLC-5Rockwell Automation | 86 | 33% | 203 | soon | |
| 30 | HurcoHurco | 82 | 32% | 109 | soon | |
| 31 | Allen-Bradley SLC 500Rockwell Automation | 81 | 32% | 188 | soon | |
| 32 | 70 | 27% | 197 | soon | ||
| 33 | Bosch RexrothBosch | 65 | 25% | 385 | soon | |
| 34 | SIMATIC S7-1500Siemens | 65 | 25% | 111 | soon | |
| 35 | Allen-Bradley MicroLogixRockwell Automation | 61 | 24% | 112 | soon | |
| 36 | Fanuc CNCFanuc | 49 | 19% | 91 | soon | |
| 37 | PilzPilz | 46 | 18% | 63 | soon | |
| 38 | Schneider Control ExpertSchneider Electric | 44 | 17% | 91 | soon | |
| 39 | GE FanucGE Vernova | 42 | 16% | 61 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Okuma users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 plc programming are named by companies instead of Okuma: Allen-Bradley by 2,072 companies, Rockwell Automation by 1,255, Siemens TIA Portal by 1,151, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/okuma/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Okuma alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Okuma?
Allen-Bradley: 2,072 companies name it in their own job postings, against 257 for Okuma.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Okuma
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.