Pure Storage alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 storage systems are named by companies instead of Pure Storage: Amazon S3 by 4,518 companies, Azure Data Lake Storage by 839, Google Cloud Storage by 775.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Pure Storage, companies in postings
- 229
- Most used alternative
- Amazon S3 · 4,518
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Amazon S3
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
storage systems companies choose instead of Pure Storage
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Pure Storage | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon S3Amazon | 4,518 | 1973% | 12,902 | Pure Storage vs Amazon S3 → | |
| 2 | Azure Data Lake StorageMicrosoft | 839 | 366% | 2,328 | Pure Storage vs Azure Data Lake Storage → | |
| 3 | Google Cloud StorageGoogle | 775 | 338% | 2,348 | Pure Storage vs Google Cloud Storage → | |
| 4 | Azure StorageMicrosoft | 558 | 244% | 1,328 | Pure Storage vs Azure Storage → | |
| 5 | NetAppNetApp | 558 | 244% | 2,240 | Pure Storage vs NetApp → | |
| 6 | CephCeph Foundation | 390 | 170% | 886 | Pure Storage vs Ceph → | |
| 7 | NFSIETF | 382 | 167% | 1,073 | Pure Storage vs NFS → | |
| 8 | Hadoop Distributed File SystemApache Software Foundation | 323 | 141% | 781 | Pure Storage vs Hadoop Distributed File System → | |
| 9 | Dell EMCDell Technologies | 303 | 132% | 707 | Pure Storage vs Dell EMC → | |
| 10 | Azure Blob StorageMicrosoft | 282 | 123% | 649 | Pure Storage vs Azure Blob Storage → | |
| 11 | iSCSIIETF | 264 | 115% | 593 | Pure Storage vs iSCSI → | |
| 12 | NVMeNVM Express | 193 | 84% | 1,159 | Pure Storage vs NVMe → | |
| 13 | Microsoft DFSMicrosoft | 187 | 82% | 375 | Pure Storage vs Microsoft DFS → | |
| 14 | MinIOMinIO | 165 | 72% | 320 | Pure Storage vs MinIO → | |
| 15 | Fibre ChannelINCITS | 144 | 63% | 308 | Pure Storage vs Fibre Channel → | |
| 16 | LustreOpenSFS | 135 | 59% | 391 | Pure Storage vs Lustre → | |
| 17 | VAST DataVAST Data | 121 | 53% | 378 | Pure Storage vs VAST Data → | |
| 18 | 106 | 46% | 320 | soon | ||
| 19 | ZFSOpenZFS | 105 | 46% | 192 | soon | |
| 20 | NTFSMicrosoft | 90 | 39% | 148 | soon | |
| 21 | Dell PowerScaleDell Technologies | 87 | 38% | 242 | soon | |
| 22 | WEKAWekaIO | 87 | 38% | 236 | soon | |
| 23 | LVMLinux | 79 | 34% | 226 | soon | |
| 24 | SynologySynology | 78 | 34% | 132 | soon | |
| 25 | NetApp ONTAPNetApp | 77 | 34% | 353 | soon | |
| 26 | 73 | 32% | 167 | soon | ||
| 27 | SATASerial ATA International Organization | 73 | 32% | 448 | soon | |
| 28 | SambaSamba Team | 59 | 26% | 99 | soon | |
| 29 | Dell PowerStoreDell Technologies | 57 | 25% | 112 | soon | |
| 30 | eMMCJEDEC | 55 | 24% | 154 | soon | |
| 31 | Amazon S3 GlacierAmazon Web Services | 50 | 22% | 99 | soon | |
| 32 | BeeGFSThinkParallel | 41 | 18% | 71 | soon | |
| 33 | Universal Flash Storage (UFS)JEDEC | 41 | 18% | 241 | soon | |
| 34 | Azure FilesMicrosoft | 40 | 17% | 86 | soon | |
| 35 | RookCNCF | 40 | 17% | 51 | soon | |
| 36 | Cisco MDSCisco | 39 | 17% | 72 | soon | |
| 37 | LonghornCNCF | 36 | 16% | 72 | soon | |
| 38 | Dell PowerMaxDell Technologies | 35 | 15% | 83 | soon | |
| 39 | DDNDataDirect Networks | 31 | 14% | 123 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Pure Storage users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 storage systems are named by companies instead of Pure Storage: Amazon S3 by 4,518 companies, Azure Data Lake Storage by 839, Google Cloud Storage by 775, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/pure-storage/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Pure Storage alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Pure Storage?
Amazon S3: 4,518 companies name it in their own job postings, against 229 for Pure Storage.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Pure Storage
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.