Travis CI alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 ci cd are named by companies instead of Travis CI: Jenkins by 6,457 companies, GitHub Actions by 6,089, GitLab CI/CD by 3,638.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Travis CI, companies in postings
- 129
- Most used alternative
- Jenkins · 6,457
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Jenkins
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
ci cd companies choose instead of Travis CI
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Travis CI | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JenkinsContinuous Delivery Foundation | 6,457 | 5005% | 27,488 | Travis CI vs Jenkins → | |
| 2 | GitHub ActionsMicrosoft | 6,089 | 4720% | 16,950 | Travis CI vs GitHub Actions → | |
| 3 | GitLab CI/CDGitLab | 3,638 | 2820% | 11,525 | Travis CI vs GitLab CI/CD → | |
| 4 | Argo CDCloud Native Computing Foundation | 2,387 | 1850% | 5,952 | Travis CI vs Argo CD → | |
| 5 | CircleCICircleCI | 671 | 520% | 1,263 | Travis CI vs CircleCI → | |
| 6 | Azure PipelinesMicrosoft | 549 | 426% | 1,155 | Travis CI vs Azure Pipelines → | |
| 7 | Atlassian BambooAtlassian | 521 | 404% | 1,297 | Travis CI vs Atlassian Bamboo → | |
| 8 | TeamCityJetBrains | 379 | 294% | 1,166 | Travis CI vs TeamCity → | |
| 9 | AWS CodePipelineAmazon Web Services | 365 | 283% | 668 | Travis CI vs AWS CodePipeline → | |
| 10 | fastlanefastlane | 267 | 207% | 554 | Travis CI vs fastlane → | |
| 11 | CopadoCopado | 266 | 206% | 660 | Travis CI vs Copado → | |
| 12 | Salesforce DXSalesforce | 260 | 202% | 516 | Travis CI vs Salesforce DX → | |
| 13 | HarnessHarness | 226 | 175% | 1,082 | Travis CI vs Harness → | |
| 14 | GearsetGearset | 214 | 166% | 399 | Travis CI vs Gearset → | |
| 15 | Google Cloud BuildGoogle | 201 | 156% | 595 | Travis CI vs Google Cloud Build → | |
| 16 | Octopus DeployOctopus Deploy | 192 | 149% | 389 | Travis CI vs Octopus Deploy → | |
| 17 | Bitbucket PipelinesAtlassian | 183 | 142% | 278 | Travis CI vs Bitbucket Pipelines → | |
| 18 | Flux CDCNCF | 179 | 139% | 348 | Travis CI vs Flux CD → | |
| 19 | AWS CodeBuildAmazon | 174 | 135% | 315 | Travis CI vs AWS CodeBuild → | |
| 20 | BitriseBitrise | 172 | 133% | 272 | Travis CI vs Bitrise → | |
| 21 | TestFlightApple | 153 | 119% | 232 | Travis CI vs TestFlight → | |
| 22 | BuildkiteBuildkite | 120 | 93% | 305 | soon | |
| 23 | 119 | 92% | 376 | soon | ||
| 24 | AWS CodeDeployAmazon Web Services | 111 | 86% | 182 | soon | |
| 25 | TektonContinuous Delivery Foundation | 106 | 82% | 648 | soon | |
| 26 | SpinnakerSpinnaker | 105 | 81% | 312 | soon | |
| 27 | AtlantisAtlantis (Runatlantis) | 70 | 54% | 145 | soon | |
| 28 | Concourse CIConcourse | 66 | 51% | 151 | soon | |
| 29 | CloudBeesCloudBees | 62 | 48% | 180 | soon | |
| 30 | XL ReleaseDigital.ai | 54 | 42% | 205 | soon | |
| 31 | CodemagicNevercode | 36 | 28% | 38 | soon | |
| 32 | UrbanCode DeployIBM | 35 | 27% | 156 | soon | |
| 33 | XL DeployDigital.ai | 33 | 26% | 113 | soon | |
| 34 | GitLab RunnerGitLab | 32 | 25% | 71 | soon | |
| 35 | KargoAkuity | 29 | 22% | 75 | soon | |
| 36 | AutoRABITAutoRABIT | 27 | 21% | 85 | soon | |
| 37 | ScrewdriverYahoo | 27 | 21% | 84 | soon | |
| 38 | FlosumFlosum | 23 | 18% | 50 | soon | |
| 39 | CruiseControlThoughtWorks | 22 | 17% | 8 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Travis CI users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 ci cd are named by companies instead of Travis CI: Jenkins by 6,457 companies, GitHub Actions by 6,089, GitLab CI/CD by 3,638, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/travis-ci/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Travis CI alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Travis CI?
Jenkins: 6,457 companies name it in their own job postings, against 129 for Travis CI.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Travis CI
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.