Compare · log management

Azure Log Analytics VS Grafana Loki_

As of 4 November 2026, Grafana Loki is named by 639 companies and Azure Log Analytics by 536; Azure Log Analytics skews to companies under 200 people (28% vs 45%), Grafana Loki to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 43%).

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Azure Log Analytics's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Grafana Loki rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Azure Log Analytics: 2–200 employees
28%
Grafana Loki: 2–200 employees
45%
Azure Log Analytics: 1,000+ employees
43%
Grafana Loki: 1,000+ employees
27%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.6 · 2.0
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
536companies name Azure Log Analytics
639companies name Grafana Loki
0name both
1,393 · 1,277postings in 90 days, Azure Log Analytics · Grafana Loki
02 — Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAzure Log AnalyticsshareGrafana LokishareLeans
Self-employed92%173%even
2-10 employees153%569%Grafana Loki
11-50 employees448%8914%Grafana Loki
51-200 employees9217%14322%Grafana Loki
201-500 employees8315%10617%even
501-1000 employees6212%569%Azure Log Analytics
1001-5000 employees10119%8513%Azure Log Analytics
5001-10000 employees407%295%Azure Log Analytics
10,001+ employees9017%589%Azure Log Analytics
By industry
SegmentAzure Log AnalyticsshareGrafana LokishareLeans
Technology & software21941%32250%Grafana Loki
Business & finance services13325%12920%Azure Log Analytics
Manufacturing & industry499%6811%even
Utilities & infrastructure234%213%even
Commerce & trade214%61%Azure Log Analytics
Consumer services & leisure153%142%even
Media & content153%325%Grafana Loki
Public, community & associations143%142%even
Property & construction132%81%even
Transport, logistics & rental132%183%even
Health care122%20%even
Automotive41%30%even
By country
SegmentAzure Log AnalyticsshareGrafana LokishareLeans
United States29154%32851%Azure Log Analytics
United Kingdom428%477%even
Canada265%––outside top 12
Germany265%477%Grafana Loki
India163%152%even
Netherlands132%122%even
France122%274%even
Spain112%81%even
Australia81%102%even
Brazil51%203%Grafana Loki
Singapore51%91%even
Belgium41%––outside top 12
Switzerland––102%outside top 12
Italy––91%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAzure Log AnalyticsshareGrafana LokishareLeans
IT operations & business systems75044%18911%Azure Log Analytics
Software engineering52231%1,16968%Grafana Loki
Data & AI1368%915%Azure Log Analytics
Sales463%131%even
Engineering (non-software)292%262%even
Customer service & success161%151%even
Product, program & project management70%171%even
Quality, safety & environment30%10%even
Unclassified30%60%even
Administration & office20%––outside top 12
General management & consulting20%20%even
Business development & strategy10%––outside top 12
construction and civil10%10%even
facilities cleaning and security10%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting10%––outside top 12
hospitality and food service10%––outside top 12
Human resources10%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications10%201%even
skilled trades and field service10%––outside top 12
arts media and entertainment––40%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Grafana Loki is named by 639 companies in job postings and Azure Log Analytics by 536; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/azure-log-analytics-vs-grafana-loki)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Azure Log Analytics vs Grafana Loki: questions

Which is more used, Azure Log Analytics or Grafana Loki?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Grafana Loki (639) over Azure Log Analytics (536). By website-and-DNS footprint, Grafana Loki (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Azure Log Analytics?

28% of Azure Log Analytics companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 45% for Grafana Loki. 43% of Azure Log Analytics companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for Grafana Loki.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Azure Log Analytics in marketing and Grafana Loki in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Azure Log Analytics or Grafana Loki, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free