Tools · Category

log management, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, Splunk leads log management with 2,606 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of ELK Stack at 2,188.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
Splunk · 2,606
Runner-up
ELK Stack · 2,188
Most hiring, 90 days
Splunk
Highest postings per company
Elastic Beats
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
9,146companies across the category
28%of them on Splunk
27,768postings naming a log management in 90 days
24tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every log management we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
SplunkCisco
2,606
11,7694.5
2
ELK StackElastic
2,188
5,1512.4
3
KibanaElastic
875
2,3942.7
4
Grafana LokiGrafana Labs
639
1,2772.0
5
536
1,3932.6
6
AWS CloudTrailAmazon Web Services
482
9882.0
7
SyslogIETF
340
7612.2
8
LogstashElastic
335
8422.5
9
240
9093.8
10
142
4152.9
11
GraylogGraylog
117
1981.7
12
Sumo LogicSumo Logic
116
1911.6
13
106
2092.0
14
CriblCribl
95
3323.5
15
67
1922.9
16
CoralogixCoralogix
51
1533.0
17
Fluent BitCNCF
46
801.7
18
FilebeatElastic
41
771.9
19
Elastic BeatsElastic
28
1475.3
20
LogScaleCrowdStrike
28
1043.7
21
Cribl StreamCribl
22
552.5
22
Elastic AgentElastic
18
703.9
23
VictoriaLogsVictoriaMetrics
17
362.1
24
NXLogNXLog
11
252.3
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Splunk leads log management with 2,606 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of ELK Stack at 2,188. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/log-management)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

log management: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free