Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEBluebeam Revu VS HCSS HeavyBid_
As of 4 November 2026, HCSS HeavyBid is named by 248 companies and Bluebeam Revu by 569; Bluebeam Revu skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 37%), HCSS HeavyBid to companies over 1,000 (23% vs 28%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Bluebeam Revu's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, HCSS HeavyBid rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Bluebeam Revu: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- HCSS HeavyBid: 2–200 employees
- 37%
- Bluebeam Revu: 1,000+ employees
- 28%
- HCSS HeavyBid: 1,000+ employees
- 23%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.5 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Bluebeam Revu | share | HCSS HeavyBid | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 8 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 28 | 5% | 7 | 3% | Bluebeam Revu |
| 11-50 employees | 68 | 12% | 18 | 7% | Bluebeam Revu |
| 51-200 employees | 128 | 22% | 66 | 27% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| 201-500 employees | 105 | 18% | 63 | 25% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| 501-1000 employees | 72 | 13% | 35 | 14% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 95 | 17% | 33 | 13% | Bluebeam Revu |
| 5001-10000 employees | 21 | 4% | 12 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 44 | 8% | 12 | 5% | Bluebeam Revu |
| Segment | Bluebeam Revu | share | HCSS HeavyBid | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property & construction | 231 | 41% | 194 | 78% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| Business & finance services | 186 | 33% | 25 | 10% | Bluebeam Revu |
| Manufacturing & industry | 37 | 7% | 10 | 4% | Bluebeam Revu |
| Public, community & associations | 24 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Bluebeam Revu |
| Technology & software | 21 | 4% | 4 | 2% | Bluebeam Revu |
| Consumer services & leisure | 17 | 3% | 1 | 0% | Bluebeam Revu |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 17 | 3% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 11 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 7 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Health care | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Bluebeam Revu | share | HCSS HeavyBid | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 476 | 84% | 211 | 85% | even |
| Canada | 36 | 6% | 21 | 8% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 3% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 2 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| France | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Bluebeam Revu | share | HCSS HeavyBid | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 767 | 41% | 50 | 5% | Bluebeam Revu |
| construction and civil | 519 | 28% | 769 | 80% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| Product, program & project management | 114 | 6% | 64 | 7% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 88 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 28 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 24 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 22 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 19 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 8 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| arts media and entertainment | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 4 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| agriculture and environment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| real estate and property | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Bluebeam Revu →
Companies using HCSS HeavyBid →
estimating takeoff markup ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
HCSS HeavyBid is named by 248 companies in job postings and Bluebeam Revu by 569; 20 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/bluebeam-revu-vs-hcss-heavybid)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Bluebeam Revu vs HCSS HeavyBid: questions
Which is more used, Bluebeam Revu or HCSS HeavyBid?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Bluebeam Revu (569) over HCSS HeavyBid (248). By website-and-DNS footprint, HCSS HeavyBid (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Bluebeam Revu?
39% of Bluebeam Revu companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 37% for HCSS HeavyBid. 28% of Bluebeam Revu companies have over 1,000 employees, against 23% for HCSS HeavyBid.
Do companies run both?
20 companies name both in their postings, usually Bluebeam Revu in marketing and HCSS HeavyBid in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Bluebeam Revu or HCSS HeavyBid, and get 1,000 records free.