Start free
Tools · Category

estimating takeoff markup, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, Bluebeam leads estimating takeoff markup with 2,740 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Bluebeam Revu at 569.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
Bluebeam · 2,740
Runner-up
Bluebeam Revu · 569
Most hiring, 90 days
Bluebeam
Highest postings per company
RIB iTWO
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
6,563companies across the category
42%of them on Bluebeam
21,456postings naming a estimating takeoff markup in 90 days
39tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every estimating takeoff markup we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
BluebeamBluebeam
2,740
10,0223.7
2
Bluebeam RevuBluebeam
569
1,4092.5
3
On-Screen TakeoffTrimble
342
7202.1
4
RIB iTWORIB Software
331
2,0936.3
5
HCSS HeavyBidHCSS
248
6942.8
6
PlanSwiftConstructConnect
228
3881.7
7
AccubidConstructConnect
222
1,1595.2
8
HCSSHCSS
216
8984.2
9
AgtekAgtek
126
3853.1
10
ACCA SoftwareACCA software
121
2862.4
11
RSMeansGordian
120
2702.3
12
CostXExactal (RIB)
118
4053.4
13
Sage EstimatingSage
85
991.2
14
AmtechTrimble
75
2743.7
15
B2W SoftwareTrimble
73
3364.6
16
Bid2WinBid2Win Software
69
1492.2
17
PriMusACCA software
64
1171.8
18
Trimble NovaTrimble
62
801.3
19
ProEstAutodesk
60
500.8
20
McCormick EstimatingMcCormick Systems
52
1032.0
21
RIB CaliforniaRIB Software
51
1372.7
22
Assemble SystemsAssemble Systems
49
921.9
23
WinEstTrimble
49
891.8
24
ConEstConEst Software
48
1433.0
25
RIB ArribaRIB Software
47
1773.8
26
BRZBRZ Deutschland
46
701.5
27
CYPECYPE Ingenieros
42
621.5
28
Bluebeam StudioBluebeam
39
2125.4
29
AutoBidAutodesk
34
742.2
30
DESTINI EstimatorBeck Technology
31
581.9
31
Quick Bid
31
882.8
32
BuildsoftBuildsoft
30
551.8
33
iSqFtConstructConnect
29
481.7
34
Accubid AnywhereConEst
27
672.5
35
Auer SuccessAuer
26
321.2
36
SmartBidSmartBid
25
301.2
37
ArquimedesCYPE
15
281.9
38
TCQTCQ
13
433.3
39
FastESTFastEST
10
141.4
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Bluebeam vs Bluebeam Revu2,740 · 569Bluebeam vs On-Screen Takeoff2,740 · 342Bluebeam vs RIB iTWO2,740 · 331Bluebeam vs HCSS HeavyBid2,740 · 248Bluebeam vs PlanSwift2,740 · 228Bluebeam Revu vs On-Screen Takeoff569 · 342Bluebeam Revu vs RIB iTWO569 · 331Bluebeam Revu vs HCSS HeavyBid569 · 248Bluebeam Revu vs PlanSwift569 · 228On-Screen Takeoff vs RIB iTWO342 · 331On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS HeavyBid342 · 248On-Screen Takeoff vs PlanSwift342 · 228RIB iTWO vs HCSS HeavyBid331 · 248RIB iTWO vs PlanSwift331 · 228HCSS HeavyBid vs PlanSwift248 · 228
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Bluebeam leads estimating takeoff markup with 2,740 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Bluebeam Revu at 569. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/estimating-takeoff-markup)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

estimating takeoff markup: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

Start free with 1,000 records
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free