Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEHCSS HeavyBid VS On-Screen Takeoff_
As of 4 November 2026, On-Screen Takeoff is named by 342 companies and HCSS HeavyBid by 248; HCSS HeavyBid skews to companies under 200 people (37% vs 46%), On-Screen Takeoff to companies over 1,000 (19% vs 23%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: HCSS HeavyBid's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, On-Screen Takeoff rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- HCSS HeavyBid: 2–200 employees
- 37%
- On-Screen Takeoff: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- HCSS HeavyBid: 1,000+ employees
- 23%
- On-Screen Takeoff: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 2.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | HCSS HeavyBid | share | On-Screen Takeoff | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 7 | 3% | 15 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 18 | 7% | 45 | 13% | On-Screen Takeoff |
| 51-200 employees | 66 | 27% | 99 | 29% | On-Screen Takeoff |
| 201-500 employees | 63 | 25% | 80 | 23% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| 501-1000 employees | 35 | 14% | 37 | 11% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| 1001-5000 employees | 33 | 13% | 41 | 12% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 5% | 10 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 12 | 5% | 13 | 4% | even |
| Segment | HCSS HeavyBid | share | On-Screen Takeoff | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property & construction | 194 | 78% | 265 | 77% | even |
| Business & finance services | 25 | 10% | 43 | 13% | On-Screen Takeoff |
| Manufacturing & industry | 10 | 4% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 3% | 1 | 0% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| Technology & software | 4 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 0% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | HCSS HeavyBid | share | On-Screen Takeoff | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 211 | 85% | 307 | 90% | On-Screen Takeoff |
| Canada | 21 | 8% | 18 | 5% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | HCSS HeavyBid | share | On-Screen Takeoff | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| construction and civil | 769 | 80% | 867 | 86% | On-Screen Takeoff |
| Product, program & project management | 64 | 7% | 44 | 4% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| Engineering (non-software) | 50 | 5% | 31 | 3% | HCSS HeavyBid |
| General management & consulting | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 5 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 3 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using HCSS HeavyBid →
Companies using On-Screen Takeoff →
estimating takeoff markup ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
On-Screen Takeoff is named by 342 companies in job postings and HCSS HeavyBid by 248; 26 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/hcss-heavybid-vs-on-screen-takeoff)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
HCSS HeavyBid vs On-Screen Takeoff: questions
Which is more used, HCSS HeavyBid or On-Screen Takeoff?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, On-Screen Takeoff (342) over HCSS HeavyBid (248). By website-and-DNS footprint, On-Screen Takeoff (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses HCSS HeavyBid?
37% of HCSS HeavyBid companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 46% for On-Screen Takeoff. 23% of HCSS HeavyBid companies have over 1,000 employees, against 19% for On-Screen Takeoff.
Do companies run both?
26 companies name both in their postings, usually HCSS HeavyBid in marketing and On-Screen Takeoff in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on HCSS HeavyBid or On-Screen Takeoff, and get 1,000 records free.