Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEBluebeam VS RIB iTWO_
As of 4 November 2026, RIB iTWO is named by 331 companies and Bluebeam by 2,740; Bluebeam skews to companies under 200 people (47% vs 54%), RIB iTWO to companies over 1,000 (18% vs 22%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Bluebeam's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, RIB iTWO rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Bluebeam: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- RIB iTWO: 2–200 employees
- 54%
- Bluebeam: 1,000+ employees
- 22%
- RIB iTWO: 1,000+ employees
- 18%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.7 · 6.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 676 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Bluebeam | share | RIB iTWO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 15 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 157 | 6% | 56 | 17% | RIB iTWO |
| 11-50 employees | 318 | 12% | 41 | 12% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 820 | 30% | 81 | 24% | Bluebeam |
| 201-500 employees | 545 | 20% | 56 | 17% | Bluebeam |
| 501-1000 employees | 281 | 10% | 33 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 373 | 14% | 33 | 10% | Bluebeam |
| 5001-10000 employees | 78 | 3% | 10 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 153 | 6% | 18 | 5% | even |
| Segment | Bluebeam | share | RIB iTWO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property & construction | 1,419 | 52% | 157 | 47% | Bluebeam |
| Business & finance services | 595 | 22% | 92 | 28% | RIB iTWO |
| Manufacturing & industry | 249 | 9% | 8 | 2% | Bluebeam |
| Technology & software | 100 | 4% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 77 | 3% | 12 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 76 | 3% | 15 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 61 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 53 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 28 | 1% | 21 | 6% | RIB iTWO |
| Health care | 26 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 24 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 21 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Bluebeam | share | RIB iTWO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 2,309 | 84% | 7 | 2% | Bluebeam |
| Canada | 151 | 6% | 1 | 0% | Bluebeam |
| United Kingdom | 54 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Australia | 28 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Netherlands | 17 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Germany | 11 | 0% | 289 | 87% | RIB iTWO |
| Sweden | 10 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 9 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 8 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Ireland | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 15 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Bluebeam | share | RIB iTWO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| construction and civil | 5,813 | 43% | 1,703 | 65% | RIB iTWO |
| Engineering (non-software) | 3,601 | 27% | 282 | 11% | Bluebeam |
| Product, program & project management | 1,003 | 7% | 45 | 2% | Bluebeam |
| Quality, safety & environment | 420 | 3% | 1 | 0% | Bluebeam |
| skilled trades and field service | 203 | 2% | 10 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 185 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 138 | 1% | 8 | 0% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 134 | 1% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 120 | 1% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 48 | 0% | 21 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 35 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 27 | 0% | 20 | 1% | even |
| facilities cleaning and security | 23 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | 23 | 0% | 44 | 2% | even |
| Unclassified | 23 | 0% | 16 | 1% | even |
| real estate and property | 21 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | 17 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 16 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 15 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 14 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 14 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 13 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 10 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 10 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| agriculture and environment | 8 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| research and science | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Bluebeam →
Companies using RIB iTWO →
estimating takeoff markup ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
RIB iTWO is named by 331 companies in job postings and Bluebeam by 2,740; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/bluebeam-vs-rib-itwo)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Bluebeam vs RIB iTWO: questions
Which is more used, Bluebeam or RIB iTWO?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Bluebeam (2,740) over RIB iTWO (331). By website-and-DNS footprint, Bluebeam (676 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Bluebeam?
47% of Bluebeam companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 54% for RIB iTWO. 22% of Bluebeam companies have over 1,000 employees, against 18% for RIB iTWO.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Bluebeam in marketing and RIB iTWO in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Bluebeam or RIB iTWO, and get 1,000 records free.